this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2023
0 points (NaN% liked)

Politics

4 readers
11 users here now

@politics on kbin.social is a magazine to share and discuss current events news, opinion/analysis, videos, or other informative content related to politicians, politics, or policy-making at all levels of governance (federal, state, local), both domestic and international. Members of all political perspectives are welcome here, though we run a tight ship. Community guidelines and submission rules were co-created between the Mod Team and early members of @politics. Please read all community guidelines and submission rules carefully before engaging our magazine.

founded 2 years ago
 

The unconfirmed allegation is raising concerns that the coffee chain is the latest corporation to cave to far-right attacks on LGBTQ people.

top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Roundcat@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This thread is the perfect example why this site is toss.

[–] Drusas@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

I'm a few weeks late in replying to your comment, but we didn't have moderation when you posted this. A few of us have just started moderating, literally today, so please give us a bit to catch up.

Please check out the stickied thread about what kind of rules and guidelines you would like to see, if you haven't already. We don't have those guidelines to work with yet, but blatant bigotry, trolling, and spamming are our first targets while we work out the details.

[–] literally_a_goose@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I understand why a domestic beer company would sympathize with the far right-- that's pretty much their customer base. But why are companies like Starbucks and Target doing it? Doesn't seem like a smart financial move.

[–] 10A@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If being normal seems far-right to you, then you just might be far-left. The vast majority of normal conservatives, which is everyone from far-right to center-left, do not want sexual immorality constantly shoved down their throats. It's an extremely tiny percentage of the population who think that's a good idea. Like any company, 100% of Starbucks' activity should be to maximize shareholder profit.

[–] Col3814444@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

“Normal” people aren’t bigots who go around saying that companies who dare to acknowledge the basic fact gay or trans people exist in the world, as ‘Sexual immortality getting shoved down our throats’.

It’s hateful religious crap like you are spreading right now that gets shoved down our throats more than anything else, that’s the real bullshit right there.

[–] 10A@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You misunderstand. What I said is not hateful, at all. Of course homosexuals exist, just like thieves, murderers, and practitioners of every other sin exist. Everyone acknowledges that. The issue is whether we repent for our sins and do God's will, or take pride in our sins and reject God. Pride itself is a sin (and some say it's the root of all other sins). That makes pride in sin a compound sin. The so-called "pride decorations" in this article are all about pride in sin (specifically the sexual immorality type). While the far-left activists think that's wonderful, and want to call everyone "hateful" and a "bigot" if we disagree, the truth is I expressed neither hatred nor bigotry. I hope we call all come to Christ, and the first step for many is to eliminate all these repugnant "pride decorations".

[–] AnakinSandlover@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Can you relax? Having your beliefs is one thing, but equating gay people to thieves and murderers is another. Most people from the time they are born have had their sexual attractions set in stone. Most men are attracted to women and vice versa. It is literally the same way for gay people.

[–] 10A@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Stop sexualizing children! There is no "gay gene". (Follow the science, or don't you like that idea anymore) Sex is strictly reserved for a grown man and woman who are joined in holy matrimony. Children are not sexual, even slightly, until puberty.

[–] QHC@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Nobody mentioned children and sexuality in the same sentence until you did.

[–] Drusas@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ignoring the religious elements, this is factually incorrect. Nobody likes to talk about it, but it's common for pre-pubescent girls to masturbate. George Carlin even had a bit about it!

Now, that's generally not talked about for good reasons--we don't want to rile up the pedophiles, and we don't want to rile up the people who are so aggressively religious that they can't acknowledge biology. But the fact of the matter is that people don't become sexual the instant they reach their country's age of consent or the instant they get married.

There's nothing wrong with you disliking those facts, but they are what they are.

[–] 10A@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You conflate puberty with the age of consent.

[–] Drusas@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

I do not. I didn't mention puberty and neither did you.

[–] AnakinSandlover@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Some people start feeling attraction at a very young age. It may not be sexual but the attraction is there. I'm a straight man and I've literally found girls to be beautiful for as long as I can remember.

[–] Drusas@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

I had my first real crush on a celebrity with sexual feelings associated when I was 8 or 9 years old. I've heard similar stories from others first hand. It's normal.

[–] QHC@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

You were being influenced by social norms long before you were old enough to form memories, and likewise not being aware of societal expectations does not mean it is not happening or does not have an effect.

[–] kgtg2@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

According to a Gallup poll 71% of Americans support same sex marriage but don't let facts get in the way of your bigotry.

[–] 10A@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The majority of that 71% thought "homosexuality is a disgusting sin, but A) it's not the government's job to enforce that, and B) I'm terrified of appearing homophobic in front of this survey-taker, because the tyrannical Left is likely to cancel me, and I can't afford to lose my job."

But saying "Sure, just let the figs get married so we can finally be done with this discussion forever" is extremely different from saying "I love rejecting God's will! I love pretending I'm not who God made me!" I love pretending God makes mistakes! I love rejecting God's holy word! I love succumbing to Satan's temptation, and engaging in repulsive acts that would make any normal Christian want to vomit! And what's more, I have pride in my evil rejection of God, because I'm basically a minion of Satan and wouldn't have it any other way! So yes, I want 'pride decorations' shoved down my throat everywhere I go, because it reminds me I'm in the presence of pure evil!" Yeah, 71% do not think that way. It's a tiny contingent of perhaps 0.01% who happen to be young, naive, nihilist, depressed, and plagued by demons.

[–] HaleyHalcyon@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How’s anyone gonna cancel you for answering a fucking anonymous poll?

[–] 10A@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I dunno, might be impossible. But the fear of getting canceled for being homophobic is very real and widespread.

[–] HaleyHalcyon@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

There’s also the fear of being fired or brutalized for being gay, so you win some you lose some.

load more comments
view more: next ›