this post was submitted on 28 May 2024
0 points (NaN% liked)

Science Memes

10304 readers
3133 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.


Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] pikmeir@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

For anyone wondering it's because the bowling ball slightly pulls the earth faster toward itself. This amount is too small to possibly measure. But imagine if the bowling ball were the size of another Earth and it's easier to see why it happens.

[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works -1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

When you drop them at the same time, it doesn't matter though.

[–] bort@sopuli.xyz 1 points 3 months ago

because of two bodies can not occupy the same space, the feather and the ball will be in different position when you drop them. And therefor gravitation will pull the earth slightly more toward the ball and slightly less toward the feather.

[–] KazuchijouNo@lemy.lol -1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

But being more massive means that due to inertia the ball will take just a tiny little wee bit longer to start moving no? So they end up falling at the same time.

Also, are these Newtonian mechanics? How do they compare to relativity at the "bowling ball and feather" scale?

Someone please correct me if I'm wrong. It's been a while since I read anything physics-related.

[–] MajorSauce@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The acceleration from gravity would be the same no matter the object mass (~9.8m/s²).

[–] KazuchijouNo@lemy.lol 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Oh yes! I omitted that part, but what I meant to say is that mass and inertia balance each other, so that in the end the acceleration from gravity ends up the same for any object.

[–] Tlaloc_Temporal@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 months ago

The bowling ball will still pull the Earth more. For us, everything accelerates at 9.8m/s² (because we all fall to the same Earth), but the Earth accelerates differently per attracting object.

[–] Tudsamfa@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago
[–] brown567@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 months ago

This is fascinating! Both of them accelerate toward the earth at the same rate, but because of the bowling ball's greater mass, the EARTH accelerates faster toward the bowling ball than it does toward the feather, so it's imperceptibly faster XD

[–] Granixo@feddit.cl -1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It's not even because it's heavier, it's because it's way more dense.

[–] shutz@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 months ago

It's not density, it's mass. A mass of 1kg compressed to the density of the Sun's core would pull the Earth with just as much force as a 1kg ball of styrofoam.

[–] Thunderwolf@lemmy.world -1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

I haven't seen anyone mention this yet, so here's how I understand it. The feather falls slower in non-vacuum conditions because it reaches its terminal velocity much more quickly than the bowling ball.

Edit: terminal velocity: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terminal_velocity

Also edit: https://ucscphysicsdemo.sites.ucsc.edu/physics-5a6a/coin-and-feather/#:~:text=Because%20the%20feather%20has%20a,small%2C%20the%20feather%20falls%20slowly.

[–] Shareni@programming.dev 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

How would it reach terminal velocity in a vacuum?

[–] Thunderwolf@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I imagine terminal velocity with no air resistance would be 9.8m/s/s. I was saying that the feather reaches terminal velocity more quickly than a bowling ball in non-vacuum conditions

[–] 0ops@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago

9.8 m/s/s is acceleration due to gravity, not a velocity, or its units would be m/s