this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2024
42 points (100.0% liked)

World News

22058 readers
78 users here now

Breaking news from around the world.

News that is American but has an international facet may also be posted here.

Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.

For US News, see the US News community.

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
alyaza@beehaw.org
gyrfalcon@beehaw.org
Gaywallet@beehaw.org
LDRMS@beehaw.org
Los@beehaw.org
s0phia@beehaw.org
remington@beehaw.org
42
B.C. bans cellphone use in schools, prohibits protests (vancouver.citynews.ca)
submitted 2 months ago by alyaza@beehaw.org to c/news@beehaw.org
18 comments fedilink hide all child comments
top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Powderhorn@beehaw.org 21 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I'm sorry, but this whole "it's unfair to deny kids the use of personal technology in class" is darkly hilarious to me. I did, in fact, try coding on my TI-85 in English class because I was bored, and it was immediately taken. Why is a phone more acceptable?

It wouldn't have been taken if left in my backpack, so any "well, what about an emergency?" arguments are disingenuous. Put your phone on silent; refrain from using it. This is not phone time. In an emergency, parents calling the school was effective with primitive '90s technology. Surely, they can still do that now.

Excuse me; I need to go yell at a cloud.

[–] CeruleanRuin@lemmings.world 4 points 2 months ago

It's still a pretty young technology, and it took a few years to understand the impacts of it. We've had them long enough now to be able to see how detrimental they have been to the first generation using them.

[–] garpujol@discuss.online 13 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I can’t imagine learning with a phone vibrating in my pocket.

[–] Domiku@beehaw.org 35 points 2 months ago

I teach high school, and it’s so hard to get students to pay attention, even with fun engaging projects. The reality is that these social apps are designed to be addictive, and it’s not a fair contest.

[–] John_McMurray@beehaw.org 11 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Prohibits protests. Rember when Eby was a civil rights advocate?

[–] orbitz@lemmy.ca 19 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

According to the article, quoted.

Access zones are in place at K-12 schools, and police can arrest or issue tickets to anyone found impeding access, disrupting or interfering with educational activities, or attempting to intimidate an individual within 20 metres (66 feet) of school property,” the province said in a release. Unquoted now...

What part of that is bad? Nothing says people can't protest but no one should interfere with kid's education. Doesn't say people can't protest, but they can't disrupt people who go in there is all which seems fair.

Edit: forgot to say I can be a bit dense and not realize things so if I'm missing a glaring fact or angle of this please do inform me.

[–] John_McMurray@beehaw.org 3 points 2 months ago (2 children)

You realize colleges and universities are schools, right?

[–] orbitz@lemmy.ca 11 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You realize it only mentions k-12 in the article and bill right? So while they are schools I can't find mention of them in this act. Can you please show where it says Universites are included? It does not in the article or the link below.

https://www.bclaws.gov.bc.ca/civix/document/id/complete/statreg/24018

[–] John_McMurray@beehaw.org 1 points 2 months ago

It's vague and doesn't exclude them.

[–] storksforlegs@beehaw.org 7 points 2 months ago

this doesnt prevent students or college protests, its to prevent outsiders protesting on school grounds ("think of the children" conservatives, Qnuts, religious or prolife groups etc etc)

[–] storksforlegs@beehaw.org 8 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Read the article, this is about preventing adults from protesting on school grounds, not outright banning protesting.

You think transphobic protests should be allowed to stand on school grounds making kids and teachers uncomfortable?

[–] John_McMurray@beehaw.org 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I just read the bill, article is wrong.

[–] storksforlegs@beehaw.org 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

edit: I read the bill, its here: https://www.bclaws.gov.bc.ca/civix/document/id/bills/billscurrent/5th42nd:gov22-1

It specifically focusses on protests on school grounds, or protests that impede access to schools. Thats it. Where does it mention other kinds of protest?

[–] tardigrada@beehaw.org 5 points 2 months ago

If we want to know whether or not digital devices should be allowed in schools, why don't we ask the folks in the Silicon Valley. They must know it, and have been telling us for years:

Parents working in Silicon Valley are sending their children to a school where there’s not a computer in sight – (2015)

In the heart of Silicon Valley is a nine-classroom school where employees of tech giants Google, Apple and Yahoo send their children. But despite its location in America’s digital centre, there is not an iPad, smartphone or screen in sight.

[–] AceFuzzLord@lemm.ee 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Those no phones in school rules would have absolutely killed me since I always listened to music in-between classes in highschool. Especially freshman world history class since I kinda relied on my phone for the digital textbook since I almost lost my physical copy I got loaned from the bookstore.

[–] blindsight@beehaw.org 3 points 2 months ago

You can get a cheap mp3 player for literally $5. Digital textbooks can be viewed just fine on a laptop, and schools have hundreds of those.

Smart phones are addiction machines. I'm very glad to see schools banning them. Hopefully, parents take note and realize how harmful they are for child development and start buying them dumb phones instead until they're older (16+).

[–] derbis@beehaw.org 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

What were the protests about?

[–] storksforlegs@beehaw.org 6 points 2 months ago

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/b-c-ban-protests-outside-schools-1.7170029

from the article:

Eby says the province has counted 18 major disruptions at schools across the province since the start of the school year, and several more before September, including demonstrators banging on classroom windows at a school in Burns Lake.

"[It's] concerning, frightening, alarming and it makes school feel like a not safe place," he said.

Eby said all of the incidents the province has counted involved demonstrators against SOGI 123 — the province's optional educational resource for teaching about sexual orientation and gender identity — but said the law is content-neutral and will be applied equally regardless of the cause.