this post was submitted on 08 Jul 2023
7 points (100.0% liked)

politics

18904 readers
3893 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] breadsmasher@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Theres the real reason

They also highlighted merchandise with "anti Christian designs such as pentagrams, horned skulls and other Satanic products."

How pathetic can you get? Your entire religion is threatened by a printed tshirt? Weak.

[–] TwoGems@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Worse yet, there were no products with pentagrams etc. There was a supplier that had a website with Satanic-esque products and Target was contracting for two items from their line that weren't Satanic. They pulled those products before they ever hit the shelves. There also was an AI generated fake series of photographs of clearly Satanic merchandise that was, well.. fake. I bet these fools took that fake story at face value.

[–] Tahssi@yiffit.net 1 points 1 year ago

Its insane. Also I didn't realize the government can control what a business can sell when it came to religious/spiritual merchandise. Freedom of religion and all that. Party of small government my ass.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They just won a case without any standing whatsoever that they can discriminate against lgbtqia+ people. Now they're trying to make it so that retailers can't even be welcoming to them.

I also see that the next "then they came for" on their list involves bringing back Satanic Panic.

[–] TheFriendlyArtificer@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I was in South Texas a few months ago (not my idea).

At a local H.E.B. There was a rack of Pride merchandise including t-shirts and bumper stickers that said "Y'all includes 'all'"

They were on clearance so my cynical brain leapt to the conclusion that nobody was buying them. Nooope. They were being destroyed and otherwise vandalized while on the shelf. This was happening so often that the manager decided that it was costing more to keep them on the shelves than the goodwill of the queer community was worth to him.

Wake me up when a corporation does more than the absolute minimum during Pride. Otherwise it's just more sociopathic virtue signaling from organizations that would happily sell Khmer Rouge branded glasses if they thought it would increase shareholder value.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I was in South Texas a few months ago (not my idea).

I live in South Texas, and know that when I say this to people who have never had a breakfast taco, the most common response is "Like, San Antonio?" So for the interest of clarity, how far south are we talking? Given your story, I'd like to know which community to be wary in if not avoid entirely if possible. (If it doesn't already confirm one of my guesses.)

More directly in response to your comment, I am aware of the existence of rainbow capitalism. That doesn't mean Republicans should get a pass for, say, calling in bomb threats to target, which has already happened. Nor should they get a pass for trying to prevent the sale of pride merch.

[–] Synthead@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Make sure you read the letter. It takes about how LGBT stuff is not appropriate for children. Cause you know, being included in society and appreciated for who you are is only for adults, and all kids are born straight and should be raised straight, right?

Stand up to bigots and bullies wherever you can, folks!

[–] ballzovsteel@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I’m getting really tired of this timeline.

[–] monsterlynn@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

@MicroWave But I thought corporations were supposed to have the same free speech rights as people!

[–] aloeha@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Welcome to fascism.