this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2024
95 points (95.2% liked)

Fuck Cars

9801 readers
13 users here now

This community exists as a sister community/copycat community to the r/fuckcars subreddit.

This community exists for the following reasons:

You can find the Matrix chat room for this community here.

Rules

  1. Be nice to each other. Being aggressive or inflammatory towards other users will get you banned. Name calling or obvious trolling falls under that. Hate cars, hate the system, but not people. While some drivers definitely deserve some hate, most of them didn't choose car-centric life out of free will.

  2. No bigotry or hate. Racism, transphobia, misogyny, ableism, homophobia, chauvinism, fat-shaming, body-shaming, stigmatization of people experiencing homeless or substance users, etc. are not tolerated. Don't use slurs. You can laugh at someone's fragile masculinity without associating it with their body. The correlation between car-culture and body weight is not an excuse for fat-shaming.

  3. Stay on-topic. Submissions should be on-topic to the externalities of car culture in urban development and communities globally. Posting about alternatives to cars and car culture is fine. Don't post literal car fucking.

  4. No traffic violence. Do not post depictions of traffic violence. NSFW or NSFL posts are not allowed. Gawking at crashes is not allowed. Be respectful to people who are a victim of traffic violence or otherwise traumatized by it. News articles about crashes and statistics about traffic violence are allowed. Glorifying traffic violence will get you banned.

  5. No reposts. Before sharing, check if your post isn't a repost. Reposts that add something new are fine. Reposts that are sharing content from somewhere else are fine too.

  6. No misinformation. Masks and vaccines save lives during a pandemic, climate change is real and anthropogenic - and denial of these and other established facts will get you banned. False or highly speculative titles will get your post deleted.

  7. No harassment. Posts that (may) cause harassment, dogpiling or brigading, intentionally or not, will be removed. Please do not post screenshots containing uncensored usernames. Actual harassment, dogpiling or brigading is a bannable offence.

Please report posts and comments that violate our rules.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

And the obligatory Not Just Bikes: https://youtu.be/Ra_0DgnJ1uQ

top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 62 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

She added that she had repeatedly asked the council to install a speed camera outside the restaurant in the hope it would encourage drivers to slow down.

You don't need a camera. You need bollards.

[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 10 points 2 months ago

And what that community needs is a buffer zone where cars aren't allowed to be within 100m of any building. Keep those areas safe for pedestrians and patrons of those businesses without worrying about CARS FLYING THROUGH WINDOWS!

[–] geolaw@lemmygrad.ml 7 points 2 months ago

Bollards with deep foundations that do not bend

[–] Tangentism@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 months ago

The council being cheap lazy bastards have said 'ooh... More temporary signs. That should work!'.

Restaurant owner: speed camera to dish out fines. Make them pay!

Road design should be that it's impossible to approach that roundabout at speed. All good road design dictates driver behaviour, not allow them to make rash or irrational choices that endanger others.

[–] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 22 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I would have installed a concrete planter box in front of the store that goes deep into the ground after the first collision.

[–] tetris11@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Genuinely. If the council is operating laissez-faire, then they shouldn't blink when people take matters into their own hands by climbing onto roofs garbed in kevlar spandex and fighting drunk drivers on said rooftops using spinning kicks and batons whilst proclaiming that they are the night even though it's still daylight and they have to keep holding on to the chimney to stop themselves from slipping on the wet roof tile whilst the fire brigade has to hoist a ladder up there to gently ease them down due to complaints of pants-wetting pleas to be let down.

[–] tiredofsametab@fedia.io 17 points 2 months ago

Did they back out and get a better run up the first two times? That's one tough car!

(I hope they do something about the obvious traffic safety issue here).

[–] Moonrise2473@feddit.it 14 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Why when I see a Volkswagen scirocco is always driven 2-3 times over the speed limit? It's 3 am where the fuck you're so hurry to go? "Oh I'm late for sleep, better drive 100 in a 40 risking killing someone"

[–] Landsharkgun@midwest.social 9 points 2 months ago (2 children)

This is why I'm convinced we need to start mechanically speed-limiting cars. We do it for ebikes, but god forbid we do it for vehicles 100x heavier. No, your 4000lb vehicle does not need to go 0-60 in 5 seconds just to get you to work everyday.

[–] IllNess@infosec.pub 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I'm all for this but there are too many car nuts and they all would just get around it somehow.

[–] Landsharkgun@midwest.social 1 points 2 months ago

That's fine. Impound the car, scrap it.

[–] LovesTha@floss.social 1 points 2 months ago

@Landsharkgun @Moonrise2473 With solid PT there shouldn't be a reason for a private passenger vehicle to travel faster than 40kmph

[–] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 11 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Why are they trying to kill me? For eating a meal, a succulent Chinese meal?

[–] cellardoor@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

RIP Charlie Dozer

[–] xlash123@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 months ago

In the US, anytime there is a crash, near miss, or other safety-related issue, the NTSB launches an investigation to determine the cause and ways to mitigate the issue from happening again. They also do this for certain highway accidents. These investigation leads to new rules and procedures that have saved countless lives and is integral to why air travel is as safe as it is today.

I would love to see the NTSB do more investigations into local traffic collisions, or at least delegate to state or local government bodies. I would love for those findings to dictate rules and regulations for safer road design. At this point, the prevalence of terrible road safety is a systemic issue that can and should be addressed by improved road design.

[–] PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] IllNess@infosec.pub 3 points 2 months ago (2 children)

https://maps.app.goo.gl/FgXRXA23FEfUgqG47

Looking at the Street View, it's a mini roundabout, with barely any space. A mini roundabout has no stop signs. There's building in the corner that might be blocking the view of other cars. And I'm pretty sure no one follows the speed limit.

[–] PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Extremely poor road design. That is a simple T-intersection and it should be a 3-way stop, nothing more. A roundabout is completely inappropriate there.

[–] IllNess@infosec.pub 1 points 2 months ago

A 3-way stop would be a solid and cost effective drop in replacement. Just paint and new signs.

[–] LovesTha@floss.social 2 points 2 months ago

@IllNess @PowerCrazy Mini roundabouts don't sound like a sane idea to me.

[–] D61@hexbear.net 4 points 2 months ago

I get it, you gotta go back for seconds... sometimes even thirds!

[–] SanguineBrah@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 2 months ago

Oswaldtwistle... Never been there but it sounds like it must be somewhere near Framley.