this post was submitted on 17 Mar 2024
28 points (93.8% liked)

Science Memes

10496 readers
2133 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.


Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DarkMessiah@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

“Whatever happened with the ozone layer panic, if scientists are so smart?”

We listened to the scientists, and the problem went away.

[–] MediciPrime@midwest.social 2 points 6 months ago

Didn't go away, just stopped getting worse at an alarming rate.

[–] Ugurcan@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

TBH “The whole world agreed on something” narrative doesn’t really reflect what happened.

Actually, The Industry dropped using CFC after a cheaper and luckily safer alternative has been discovered right around that time.

[–] GermainRobitaille@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

When you do things right, people won't be sure you've done anything at all.

[–] fannymcslap@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Okay why the fuck has this been top of my front page for two days

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl -1 points 6 months ago

Lemmy auto sorts by "active" so my responding to you will now keep it at the top of your page for day 3 lol

[–] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Similar with Y2K


it was only a nothingburger because it was taken seriously, and funded well. But the narrative is sometimes, "yeah lol it was a dud."

[–] Tranus@programming.dev -1 points 6 months ago

Y2K specifically makes no sense though. Any reasonable way of storing a year would use a binary integer of some length (especially when you want to use as little memory as possible). The same goes for manipulations; they are faster, more memory efficient, and easier to implement in binary. With an 8-bit signed integer counting from 1900, the concerning overflows would occur in 2028, not 2000. A base 10 representation would require at least 8 bits to store a two digit number anyway. There is no advantage to a base 10 representation, and there never has been. For Y2K to have been anything more significant than a text formatting issue, a whole lot of programmers would have had to go out of their way to be really, really bad at their jobs. Also, usage of dates beyond 2000 would have increased gradually for decades leading up to it, so the idea it would be any sort of sudden catastrophe is absurd.