this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2024
271 points (98.2% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7114 readers
725 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 22 points 1 month ago (2 children)

She didn’t just win, she whopped Don Samuels ass.

[–] WanderingVentra@lemm.ee 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Fuck ya! Finally AIPAC doesn't get a win.

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

AIPAC didn’t invest in this race

[–] WanderingVentra@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago

Ah, interesting. I guess that helps.

[–] Tyfud@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They did, just not as heavily as the others

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Technically, yes. But the amount of money they spent was basically nothing.

Open Secrets has them on record for spending twenty five bucks.

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/democrat-ilhan-omar-faces-latest-test-us-houses-liberal-squad-2024-08-13/

[–] delirious_owl@discuss.online 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

56% doesn't seem like a whopping

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

A 14% lead is pretty substantial in this day and age.

[–] lemmyseizethemeans@lemmygrad.ml 13 points 1 month ago

Fuck yeah! This is great news

[–] delirious_owl@discuss.online 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Omar reported raising about $6.2 million. Samuels raised about $1.4 million.

Oh wow, she actually raised more money than her opponent. Did AIPAC even donate in this race?

[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 11 points 1 month ago

AIPAC are saving the big guns for AOC

[–] trabpukcip@hexbear.net 10 points 1 month ago
[–] takeda@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Off topic, but how is the thumbnail actually picked up? I looked at the article and can't find this specific picture anywhere.

[–] OhNoMoreLemmy@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

For breaking news stories, the website might keep updating the pictures.

Lemmy presumably goes to the website, and downloads a relevant image to use as a thumbnail. Then the writers update the article images.

[–] elbucho@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Typically, when links are published to link aggregator sites like lemmy or reddit or whatever, the link aggregator looks for a meta tag marked thumbnail to grab the URL for the image. It looks like this:

<meta name="thumbnail" content="https://path/to/img.jpg">

In this case, the thumbnail tag contains a url to a different picture, and the one used for this link is nowhere to be found, so I’m guessing that when OP created the link, Lemmy cached the thumbnail picture from the provided URL, and then afterwards, AP changed it in their article.

[–] lolrightythen@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

I think websites do that quite often these days. If you are trying to see the thumbnail in full resolution, they won't put it in the article, so you have to scan the entire page fruitless.

It causes me irritation.

[–] delirious_owl@discuss.online 1 points 1 month ago

Look up twitter cards and Facebook graph HTML tags.