this post was submitted on 10 Aug 2024
-87 points (9.3% liked)

politics

19097 readers
3230 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

As wildly different as Harris and Trump are, their campaigns seem to share a degree of indifference to the specifics of what their candidates are saying, because both campaigns realize that many of their voters are unconcerned about such details—or, at the very least, are unlikely to be moved by them. What matters to many voters right now is their hatred and fear, however justified, of the opposing candidate, and the fun they have calling the other side weird, dangerous, and deranged.

Paywall removed: https://archive.is/DQNOH

all 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Enkers@sh.itjust.works 39 points 3 months ago (2 children)

How transparent can return2ozma be?

[–] JimSamtanko@lemm.ee 2 points 3 months ago

Oh we all know what they are, we just aren’t allowed to say it.

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 25 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Christ this article is tone deaf. Harris is all about policy. She's literally the current Vice President, as in, she's currently working to implement the policies of an administration. This author is acting like she's somehow unheard of, and new.

[–] thallamabond@lemmy.world 17 points 3 months ago (2 children)
[–] benderbeerman@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 months ago

ITT: Disinformation/influencer shills... take note.

Don't listen to people on the internet about political opinions

[–] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world -4 points 3 months ago

New Yorker - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for New Yorker:

MBFC: Left - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.newyorker.com/news/fault-lines/how-generic-can-kamala-harris-be
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

[–] 14th_cylon@lemm.ee -5 points 3 months ago

maybe there will be something specific -

Harris also expressed support for raising the federal minimum wage. She told reporters earlier today that she would release her policy platform next week, with a focus on the economy and on lowering costs for working families.

https://www.nytimes.com/live/2024/08/10/us/harris-trump-election