this post was submitted on 09 Aug 2024
294 points (98.7% liked)

politics

19097 readers
3979 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] solarvector@lemmy.zip 118 points 3 months ago (4 children)

It's ridiculous how effective "Republicans = economy" propaganda has been.

[–] kescusay@lemmy.world 96 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yep. They have literally never been good for the economy in my life time.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 36 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

at the risk of sounding like a one-upper... I'm pretty sure theyv'e never been good for the economy in my parent's lifetime, either. And probably never have been, if we're being honest.

fun fact here is that while Walz is "anti-business" his policies across his 6 years as governor here has grown the MN economy, and business here are doing better than ever.

[–] Bassman1805@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago

I think Eisenhower did petty good for the economy. That was nearly 100 years ago though.

[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

The Republicans haven't been good for the economy since Teddy Roosevelt held office.

[–] teamevil@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

They probably mean his policies are bad for billionaires, like musk would never ever set up shop there

[–] FunderPants@lemmy.ca 37 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Conservative = Economy propaganda is prevelent all over the place, and just as effective, and just as false.

[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 39 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Don't forget the "Biden = inflation" propaganda

As is tradition, the Republican fucked everything up, and then successfully blamed his successor for things being fucked during the successor's term of office. You would think that people would remember 15% unemployment and having to wash your groceries and hide in your house and a multi-trillion-dollar emergency bailout program so half the country didn't go out of business and starve, but apparently not.

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago

wait until people find out republicans are the people who let the most criminals into the country

[–] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 30 points 3 months ago (1 children)

funny how they had to abandon the demonstrably bullshit "trickle-down" narrative and just switched to "only commie libruls want to tax billionaires!!!"

they want everyone to forget about kansas

don't ever forget about kansas

[–] shani66@ani.social 14 points 3 months ago

It's wild that people still try to pull that shit. We've known high tax rates and prosperity go hand in hand since, basically, the start of advanced economics.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 29 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Headlines like that are just so surreal. What person in their right mind could think Trump had any kind of economic competence?

[–] Coelacanth@feddit.nu 14 points 3 months ago

You see the thinking is actually based in his many personal bankruptcies. The idea is to put the country into enough debt that it integer overflows into prosperity. It almost worked last time!^[1]

[–] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world -5 points 3 months ago

CNBC - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for CNBC:

MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: Mostly Factual - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.cnbc.com/2024/08/09/harris-erases-trumps-lead-economy-new-cnbc-generation-lab-survey.html
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support