In this case the mistakes were obvious. It’s more frightening to know that as the tech advances the errors will be more subtle, and for important subjects.
this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2023
30 points (100.0% liked)
Technology
20 readers
4 users here now
This magazine is dedicated to discussions on the latest developments, trends, and innovations in the world of technology. Whether you are a tech enthusiast, a developer, or simply curious about the latest gadgets and software, this is the place for you. Here you can share your knowledge, ask questions, and engage in discussions on topics such as artificial intelligence, robotics, cloud computing, cybersecurity, and more. From the impact of technology on society to the ethical considerations of new technologies, this category covers a wide range of topics related to technology. Join the conversation and let's explore the ever-evolving world of technology together!
founded 2 years ago
Very much so. It also highlights a shift in how writing works now that I'm concerned about: when humans are doing it, generally someone will copyedit or beta read (admittedly, not on clickbait sites). With AI? Yolo, just publish it as-is, since not paying humans was the whole point. We're gonna see more and more of that.
So it's working exactly like the rest of Gawker's "writers."
If I were going to post something wrong on the Internet, the last thing I would want it to be about is Star Wars. The comment section must be insane.
Fear not! Apparently, they cleverly avoided that by disabling comments for that story when they published it.
view more: next ›