this post was submitted on 29 Jun 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

Linux

5 readers
2 users here now

founded 2 years ago
 

When it comes to Linux Distros, each are either managed by their community or by a company. With recent news, it becomes clearer than ever that those managed...

top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] thingsiplay@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

@wave_walnut Thanks, the recap was important to understand what happened so far. As it seems, the writing was on the wall. Now I understand why so many was against Red Hat, similar to how they were against Canonical (but for other reasons).

[–] bedrooms@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago

In the past, I've got upvotes for dissing Canonical. The funny thing is that I'd get downvotes instead if I replace Canonical with Ubuntu.

[–] Jarmer@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm pretty happy with my Tumbleweed installation, and I don't think I'll be leaving anytime soon.

[–] raspberry_confetti@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Right? Like it or not, we live in a society dominated by money. A very small number of Linux distributions have found a way to sustainably produce an excellent product. That's a good thing. The alternatives are either burnout or insecurity.

[–] sik0fewl@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

And let's not forget that a lot of contributions to Linux have come from Red Hat and other companies.

[–] nostalgicgamerz@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What the fuck is happening with RedHat? Can someone explainlikeimfive?

[–] falsem@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

RedHat is only going to provide source code to their paying customers. This is legally compliant with the GPL. This has made a lot of people mad because there are a lot of distros that are essentially copy/pasted Redhat code that people use.