Not what you asked, but if you want a deep dive into dialectical materialism, with comparisons to the predominant systems of thought, you might try Elementary principles of philosophy. It was written for a working class audience, but doesnβt underestimate their intelligence.
this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2024
47 points (87.3% liked)
Asklemmy
43917 readers
987 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy π
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- !lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
Thanks from me as well. I'm on a huge philosophy kick and did a dialectics dive on my last big socialist theory reading binge so this seems like a good way to bridge the gap a bit.
Thank you
Thanks. Can you refer to any texts that provide a sort of retrospective on what happened?
Dialectical Materialism is more for analyzing problems correctly, not solving them outright. It's useful for conflict analysis, such as Israel/Palestine. Israel is an Imperialist tool employed by the US to maintain pressure in the Middle East, which is why the US invests so heavily in it. In turn, there is a material basis for exceptionalism and nationalism among Israelis, along with a drive for more land via settler-colonialism. This results in a dehumanizing effort against Palestinians, resulting in genocide, and in turn conflict.
Solving this means undoing the Imperialism and going with a One-State solution, eliminating the base of the problems represented through the Superstructure.
Politzer's Elementary Principles of Philosophy is a great intro to DiaMat.
Dialectical Materialism is more for analyzing problems correctly, not solving them outright.
I donβt take Mao literally in his saying, βwhen you have investigated the problem thoroughly, you will know how to solve it.β More accurately might be: until you have thoroughly investigated a problem, youβre not likely to find a solution.
Yep, that's more what I'm getting at. Dialectical Materialism helps frame the variables at play, and might help show what variables can actually be tweaked, but makes no description of how to tweak.
If you want to go down the rabbit hole read Five Essays on Philosophy by Mao Zedong, Mao Zedong literature it's better explaining dialectic materialism into everyday life than Russian authors in my humble POV.
Thank you
You are welcome, good luck!! ππ€
Imo it's only a tool to understand and explain situations, not so much a tool to solve problems. Definitely understanding the forces that make up the conflict might help you solve a problem, but the solution will depend on what kind of forces are involved.
Aah. Are there examples on how it was applied to expose the causes of social issues in a normal/small-scale scenario?