this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2024
189 points (99.5% liked)

News

23303 readers
5479 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Ticketmaster’s troubled handling of Taylor Swift’s Eras Tour prompted California lawmakers to spend months cracking down on the ticketing industry — while they enjoyed thousands of dollars worth of free tickets themselves from interest groups, a POLITICO analysis shows.

One assemblymember even appears to have accepted concert tickets to that very Swift tour, which prompted the effort to dismantle ticketing monopolies following backlash over Ticketmaster’s glitch-riddled sales rollout. She was later involved in legislative efforts to regulate the industry that ultimately stalled.

The findings are part of a wider POLITICO analysis of all 120 state lawmakers’ financial disclosures last year that found 66 state assemblymembers and senators received more than $30,000 total worth of tickets. The giveaways included entrance to Disneyland with mouse ears included, a music festival pass to see country music stars like Eric Church, and San Francisco 49ers seats. One of the biggest recipients of tickets to college sporting events also chairs the higher education committee.

top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] thesporkeffect@lemmy.world 56 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I love how carefully the article steps around the central issue of who was doing the bribing. In context it seems likely it was Ticketmaster lobbyists, but the article would have you presume the tickets materialized from the ether and landed gently on a series of legislator desks.

[–] PythagreousTitties@lemm.ee 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Does "accepting" a gift/ticket mean they used that ticket? What if someone accepted a ticket, put it on the form as a gift, but didn't use it? Or are they one and the same.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Prove that it wasn’t used.

They should never have been accepted in the first place.

[–] PythagreousTitties@lemm.ee -2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

I mean, yeah that's what I'm saying. Do they check to see if they were used? verything is electronic. There are no paper tickmaster tickets.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

What’s your point?

Prove the tickets weren’t used. Prove that there is no corruption.

Once you receive those tickets, or whatever the bribe is, it’s a hook. Any amount of “yeah but” here only allows more corruption.

[–] PythagreousTitties@lemm.ee -2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I'm asking if they check to see if the tickets were used. I don't know why that's difficult for you to understand.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

ticketmaster can check.

But oversight committees or whatever? Good luck with that.

It’s almost impossible to verify those tickets weren’t used. Even if they can demonstrate they were someplace else the entire night- those tickets could have been given to friends or family. Or scalped, or any other sort of thing.

Even if they didn’t use them, they’re still a hook because of how it appears. Once somebody receives free stuff, in what is obviously a quid pro quo, any moral integrity is lost.

How is that so difficult for you to understand?

[–] PythagreousTitties@lemm.ee -1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

If they used in anyway then the bribe was successful. If they only accepted it as a "whatever thanks", filed it in the books, and then never used it then they were not successful bribed.

That's my point of view on it. Obviously flat out not accepting it would be key though.
I'm not well versed in the area of accepting bribes. But Im willing to learn first-hand. Wink wink

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Your point of view is quite wrong.

“Oh you remember those tickets we gave you? That you accepted? If you don’t do XYZ, we’re going to leak that unreceived gifts. And it’s going to look bad because, well you did.”

That’s why they’re called hooks. They start small and inconsequential. Maybe not even wrong. But they get worse over time and you’re stuck.

That’s how corruption works.

[–] PythagreousTitties@lemm.ee -1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

The tickets were all listed on the forms they use to report gifts. There's no leaking the gifts like you're imagining.

That's all explained in the article.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Just because they appear on a form doesn’t mean that the public knows about.

A lot of graft gets covered up in bullshit that way.

[–] PythagreousTitties@lemm.ee -1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

The forms are literally for informing the public about gifts received.

I now know you haven't even read the article, so talking to you about this is meaningless since all you seem to want to be is right. I was asking a serious question about the process, not looking to argue about whatever it is youre looking to argue about. Thanks for wasting my time.

Enjoy the rest of your day.

[–] PythagreousTitties@lemm.ee -1 points 3 months ago

Nice edit after the fact.
You're obviously emotional about this, and I could care less, I'm just asking about the process.

Chill out homie.

[–] StrawberryPigtails@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Considering how much the tickets cost the few times I was interested in seeing something live, $30,000 worth of tickets isn’t that many tickets. This feels like manufactured outrage to me.

[–] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 months ago

The article goes into that, if you'd bothered to read it.

A freebie worth $590 is well below the $5,500 maximum campaign donation from an individual or business. But gifts like tickets can make a much greater impact, said Daniel Schnur, a government ethics expert and former chair of the Fair Political Practices Commission.

“If I send money to a legislator’s campaign account, I get a thank you note. If I attend a reception, I get a handshake. If I take them out to lunch or dinner, I get a conversation,” Schnur said. “But if I get them tickets for a concert or a basketball game, I now have a friend who takes my phone calls.”