this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2024
468 points (97.8% liked)

politics

19120 readers
3971 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

You don’t need to be an expert in electoral politics to understand Rule One of any campaign: Candidates should pursue as many votes as possible. In a democracy, it’s common sense: The more votes a campaign has, the greater the chance of success.

With this in mind, Donald Trump appears to have a counterintuitive rhetorical habit. The New Republic noted:

On Fox News Thursday morning, Donald Trump had a weird instruction for his supporters: they don’t have to vote. “My instruction: We don’t need the votes, I have so many votes,” Trump said on Fox & Friends before going on a rant about how much support he has in Florida.

As a clip from the show makes clear, the former president didn’t appear to be kidding: https://x.com/atrupar/status/1816482779581775943

If the phrasing sounded at all familiar, it’s not your imagination. The day after last month’s presidential debate, for example, Trump held a rally in Virginia and told attendees, “We don’t need votes.”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] norimee@lemmy.world 219 points 3 months ago (4 children)

They don't need the votes because they have a plan in place to seize the power with undemocratic measures.

It's all he's been saying the last few weeks. If you listen to him, he says again and again, that they plan to abolish american democracy.

[–] emax_gomax@lemmy.world 55 points 3 months ago (1 children)

ISTG if trump loses, incites another insurrection and we still don't put him jail I don't know what the point of it is anymore.

[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 38 points 3 months ago (1 children)

This is a common feeling with a lot of people. Not jailing rapists and other criminals just because their daddies were wealthy breaks down the social fabric. After all, if it's everyone for themselves, why shouldn't I steal from Walmart? Why should I not commit fraud against corps? Why should I not try and murder a presidential candidate?

The public not seeing that crimes against the social contract have consequences will be the actual thing that breaks society, not gay people loving each other.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] n1ck_n4m3@lemmy.world 24 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

As one of the other posters mentioned (@Jordan117@lemmy.world) , it's exactly this. Johnson will refuse to certify the results of the election that put Democrats in the House, claiming some kind of bullshit irregularities with no proof, leaving the House controlled by facists. They'll then claim irregularities in the presidential election and force a contingent election where they have a 100% chance of electing Trump no matter what the public votes.

More people need to be made aware that this is 100% legal for them to do, and more people need to be aware that it is almost certainly what they will try. The only thing that can possibly stop it is significant awareness by the mass population of Americans and significant publicity (similar to how mass awareness of Project 2025 turned it into a poison pill).

EDIT: Oh look, they’ve already started making it super-legal in battleground states: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/article/2024/aug/06/georgia-local-election-boards-allowed-withhold-vote-certification

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] octopus_ink@lemmy.ml 7 points 3 months ago

Conservatives: "It's just a joke!"

Also Conservatives: "Jan 06 was tourists!"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] zcd@lemmy.ca 166 points 3 months ago (6 children)

He's going to attack the capital. Again.

[–] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 103 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Attacking capital is great, it's attacking capitols I have a problem with

[–] zcd@lemmy.ca 59 points 3 months ago (5 children)
[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Last time they only got in because Trump stopped the security forces from doing their job. This time it will be different.

[–] thefartographer@lemm.ee 8 points 3 months ago

Get rekt, Jackson!

[–] Jordan117@lemmy.world 42 points 3 months ago (5 children)

Attacking the capital was a last-ditch hail mary move, and only viable when he controlled the military.

They're going to use baseless conspiracies to try to fuck with the election certification enough (with an assist from the courts) to force a contingent election in the House, where they'll likely have a majority of state delegations.

[–] FoxyFerengi@lemm.ee 19 points 3 months ago

Well, that's terrifying

[–] rayyy@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The whole Republicans house is in on it again. They have a multi-prong plan to seize the White House, from voter suppression to elector rigging, gerrymandering and outright violent intimidation. The coup will be much better planned this time.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Bye@lemmy.world 16 points 3 months ago

Way harder to do when you aren’t the sitting president

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 126 points 3 months ago (1 children)

One aspect of the fake elector scheme was to block the counting of rightfully assigned electoral college votes.

If they can successfully do that in enough states to prevent either candidate from getting 270, then it goes to the House of Representatives to select the president.

Each state gets one vote, and since there are only 19 states with Democratic controlled legislatures, that would guarantee a Trump win, no voting necessary.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 69 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

They managed to shore this one up after Jan 6. Now, instead of just needing a single Representative and Senator to challenge a vote, you need 1/5 of each body.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Electoral_Count_Reform_and_Presidential_Transition_Improvement_Act_of_2022

So an improvement, no doubt Election Denialers have more schemes in mind though.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 24 points 3 months ago

Even at 1/5th of each body... 88 Congressmen and 20 Senators... The Republicans have that, 220 and 50.

[–] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 105 points 3 months ago (3 children)

This article, combined with the Rolling Stone article just posted about 70+ election deniers running elections in critical states and counties, I have a strong feeling that Trump thinks he has already stolen the next election. The fix is in.

[–] aseriesoftubes@lemmy.world 78 points 3 months ago

This is it. His advisors have told him about this plan, and the orange idiot can’t keep his fucking yap shut about anything. He’s literally saying the quiet part out loud.

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 22 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Anything we can do to get the traitors out of these key positions?

[–] knightly@pawb.social 27 points 3 months ago

Nothing I'd want to suggest on a public forum..

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DogPeePoo@lemm.ee 94 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Because the fix is in with the Republican state legislatures and Republican Governors; and The DOJ / Supreme Court is gladly eating Trump’s soiled diapers with a fork and knife

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 33 points 3 months ago (2 children)

It's gonna be 2001 again unless Harris can really knock it out of the park

[–] cmoney@lemmy.world 26 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Only this time tRump owns the supreme Court

[–] Timii@biglemmowski.win 20 points 3 months ago (1 children)

This is my take too. Whole country votes solidly blue but the SC crowns Trump king anyways.

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I don't think they can do that, but I don't doubt they'll try

[–] grue@lemmy.world 27 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Trump has done literally hundreds of things he "can't" do and only one person has come anywhere close to stopping him.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] zaph@sh.itjust.works 62 points 3 months ago

If there's one thing magats have right it's that Donnie tells it like he sees it. The reason he doesn't need votes is because he thinks he can steal the election. It's pretty simple when you don't look too deep and with him you never should.

[–] kandoh@reddthat.com 37 points 3 months ago (5 children)

Even if you are planning to cheat, you'd still want as many people voting for you as possible.

[–] invertedspear@lemm.ee 26 points 3 months ago

This implies he’s conniving. I don’t think he’s mentally fit enough anymore. Behind closed doors he worries about what will happen if he loses and they tell him, “you don’t need the votes, we’ll fix it if you don’t get them” and he’s just not with it enough to not brag about how smart and great he is. He lets things slip all the time. So now he’s made speeches saying people won’t have to vote, they’re going to fix it for him, etc. His team is likely freaking out that he keeps slipping, but it’s mixed in with so much bullshit rambling that it’s easy to play off. We absolutely need to be prepared for fuckery this fall.

[–] randon31415@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] kandoh@reddthat.com 28 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Sorry, I never watched Naruto

[–] randon31415@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago (2 children)

President of Venezuela. Got 30% of the vote. Had his guys say he won anyways.

[–] kandoh@reddthat.com 13 points 3 months ago

Damn, I hope Naruto stops him

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] capt_wolf@lemmy.world 37 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

"We don't need the votes because we're going to call this election rigged and stolen just like the last one. We're going to challenge the legitimacy of Harris as a candidate and draw out the election results in court for years. Hopefully we'll get it to the supreme court where my lackies will nullify the results and declare me leader. At the same time, we'll call for more violence against our enemies and try to incite a full blown civil war because I'm a narcissistic man-child who can't accept that I could be wrong and lose."

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] carl_dungeon@lemmy.world 25 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Because he wants to be a dictator, why is this a question?

[–] Bremmy@lemmy.ml 13 points 3 months ago

"Why does a fascist say fascist things??"

[–] kmartburrito@lemmy.world 22 points 3 months ago

Sounds like something a weird ass geriatric narcissist would say

[–] finley@lemm.ee 18 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Because he wants to become a dictator for life

[–] Laereht@lemmy.world 16 points 3 months ago (5 children)

Maybe it's his feeble attempt at reverse psychology? It's probably something more nefarious but we must account for stupidity

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] regdog@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago
[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago

Probably a mixture of overconfidence and saying the quiet part out loud (i.e. he expects state and local leaders to "give him" the win). If you're in a swing state you really need to volunteer to watch the polls or help administer.

[–] Red_October@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago

Because he's counting on not having, or needing, the votes to win. His plan is to call the Election rigged, get Mike Johnson to refuse to certify the results, throw the election. Being "So confident" that he has more than enough votes to win, and then showing election results that have him way behind Harris, will just feed his narrative of a rigged election. He'll go on about how a disparity like that isn't possible, Johnson will parrot the same shit, opening a process that is much more unclear to certify a different result.

Trump is laying the groundwork for an election loss, sewing seeds of doubt that he could lose my any margin, much less a big one. When the results come in, the bigger the landslide against him, the louder his screeching that it was obviously rigged.

[–] PyroNeurosis@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 3 months ago

He didn't care for the look of needing just 11,780 votes, so he doesn't need any.

load more comments
view more: next ›