this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2024
207 points (95.2% liked)

politics

19144 readers
5938 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] slurpeesoforion@startrek.website 65 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Did something happen to those viewers to prevent them from viewing? Maybe catch a contagious disease?

[–] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 9 points 3 months ago

FAKE cough cough wheeze NEWS. cough cough wheeze

[–] Delusional@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Nah trump is really only responsible for about a couple hundred thousand of those deaths. Not anywhere near 5 million.

But he is most certainly responsible for hundreds of thousands of American deaths.

[–] DogPeePoo@lemm.ee 50 points 3 months ago
[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 24 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Being stupid on TV just doesn't pull the same audience anymore. Also, use relative measurements for these headlines! "5 million" is useless without context. That's over 20%!

[–] Pronell@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago (1 children)

But that audience is the cult.

If they aren't tuning in to watch the cult leader, that's potentially good news down the line for turnout.

Maybe just hopium, but if their enthusiasm drops, we win.

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago
[–] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 16 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Seems to be going around.

I know I used to watch them just to see what to prepare for. Now I don’t even want the Clif Notes.

[–] tiefling@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 3 months ago

Project 2025 is the clif notes

[–] Delusional@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

When you keep watching evil people doing evil things and being happy about it, it gets really tiring.

[–] yesman@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago

There's only one thing that matters: ratings

Donald J. Trump

[–] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 11 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I bet most of those are dems wondering what the crazy will be.

[–] SidewaysHighways@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

That's me right now!

[–] profdc9@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago

Yes, everyone wants to see the Republican circlejerk.

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago
[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago

I cast [HUNGRY NARCISSIST]

[–] Kabloink@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago

It's just a multi night political advertisement. No thanks.

[–] Guy_Fieris_Hair@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I am actually surprised. Seems some people would chime in to see what his ear looked like or what is going on.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 4 points 3 months ago

How long do you think he's going to wear that gauze? I suspect it, or something similar, stays on until at least election day. Maybe he gets a gold eartip or something.

[–] HappycamperNZ@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

I only clicked here as its the first post I've seen with his new look.

Every other used old images. Possibly when he was younger inline with their "Biden old" rhetoric.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

Excepting journalists, why would anyone care?

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 4 points 3 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Despite Donald Trump’s dramatic appearance days after an assassination attempt, the opening night of the Republican National Convention drew in five million fewer viewers than the first night of the convention back in 2016 – when he became the party’s presidential candidate for the first time.

Fox News had the highest ratings for its RNC coverage, with 6.9 million viewers as of 10pm on Monday.

On MSNBC on Tuesday, host Lawrence O’Donnell waded in on the numbers, saying “this is a very low-rated convention.”

Trump unveiled JD Vance as his vice presidential pick in a Truth Social post on Monday, before making his first public appearance since surviving the shooting at his rally in Pennsylvania at the weekend.

On Tuesday, he returned to the RNC to watch two old rivals, Nikki Haley and Ron DeSantis, take to the stage to endorse him in the election.

Now, Vance is set to take to the stage on Wednesday for his first major address since he was tapped to be Trump’s new running mate.


The original article contains 370 words, the summary contains 168 words. Saved 55%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] mctoasterson@reddthat.com 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

It is also Allstar week in Major League Baseball, and night 1 of the RNC coincided with the Home Run Derby.

Of people who still watch broadcast or cable TV as their source of nightly entertainment, I'm going to guess most people were watching dudes hit homeruns instead of watching a glorified political ad.

[–] xc2215x@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago
[–] Atelopus-zeteki@kbin.run 2 points 3 months ago

It didn't watch, either time.

[–] enbyecho@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Is he gonna wear that bandage until November?

[–] synae@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

In 2016 there was an actual race to be won, a question to be answered, a reason to watch.

Ever since then, the party has been all in on trump. No serious challenge has been made, and it turns out that doesn't make for very good TV.

[–] NevermindNoMind@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Yes, there was a lot of talk of a delegate revolt to prevent Trump from getting the nomination. Ted Cruz took to the convention floor to tell delegates to "vote their conscious". Everybody wondered whether Trump, this joke of a candidate who actually won, would have the sense to pivot away from hard right rhetoric during his speech to appeal to the swing voters he would need to win over, given the seemingly insurmountable obstacle the Clinton Machine posed.

This year there is no drama, we all know who Trump is, to the point where we can all just imagine what his speech will be and it will accurate. What's the point of watching?