this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2024
59 points (100.0% liked)

Gaming

30424 readers
608 users here now

From video gaming to card games and stuff in between, if it's gaming you can probably discuss it here!

Please Note: Gaming memes are permitted to be posted on Meme Mondays, but will otherwise be removed in an effort to allow other discussions to take place.

See also Gaming's sister community Tabletop Gaming.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] stardust@lemmy.ca 29 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Never really understood why companies like Twitter can have thousands of employees for what the product is.

[–] jarfil@beehaw.org 17 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Redundant, like the server staff who told Elon it would take 6 months to move the servers... so he decided to move them himself on a whim... and it took 6 months to finish making them operational again?

Or redundant like the content moderation staff, whose redundancy has turned X into an even bigger dumpster fire?

Moderating and serving the content from 300 million users, worldwide, in near real time and no downtime, might seem like a simple task, but it really is not.

[–] Fiivemacs@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago

Leaked twitter moderation steps.

If racist, then allow

If woke, then bully and shadow ban

[–] bl4kers@beehaw.org 12 points 2 months ago (1 children)

To be fair, Twitter needs very good infrastructure to be usable (e.g. caching) and obviously content moderation is as robust as their investment in it (those could be contract workers though)

[–] zhunk@beehaw.org 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] bl4kers@beehaw.org 8 points 2 months ago

Oh, sure, I didn't mean to compare the two really. Just pointing out that although Twitter is simple and easy to replicate in concept, trying to scale to support all humans as users (theoretically) is difficult

[–] Rolive@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 2 months ago

They don't tbh. I think many jobs there are redundant but people play an elaborate game to pretend it isn't.

[–] Kiosade@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 months ago

Me neither, and I guess they didn’t need them all in the end!

[–] bermuda@beehaw.org 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Easy to employ so few when you ~~dont~~ rarely make games anymore

[–] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

They had the same or fewer employees when they were making games, though.

[–] bermuda@beehaw.org 1 points 2 months ago
[–] dino@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Artifact, Heroes of the Storm etc. those are not success stories of recent Valve.

[–] smeg@feddit.uk 15 points 2 months ago (1 children)

HotS is a Blizzard game, Valve has DOTA2

[–] dino@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 2 months ago (2 children)

facepalm I truly mixed that in my brain. But Valve also has this Dota Chess Game, right? Not sure if you would count that as a success though, have totally lost track of it.

[–] astrionic@beehaw.org 8 points 2 months ago

You're thinking of Dota Underlords, which was popular for a short time but then quickly got abandoned. I definitely wouldn't count it as a success.

[–] smeg@feddit.uk 8 points 2 months ago

I've not played Half Life Alyx but people seemed to like it. And let's not forget the huge success of the Steam Deck!

[–] Kissaki@beehaw.org 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

as of 2021, Valve employed just 79 people for Steam, which is one of the most influential gaming storefronts on the planet.

There's value in stability, but some things have long been stagnant and could be improved. It took a long time for the client and website to get some significant changes.

I don't know if I would prefer more changes. I certainly would like and want some. But that could inevitably lead to undesirable changes too.

When I applied for a job there over a decade ago [to improve some stuff myself] I didn't receive an answer. bee laugh emoji