this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2023
-9 points (32.0% liked)

World News

32327 readers
890 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] authed@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We don't need limits on Lemmy.. most of the time the instances are down

[โ€“] Figaro2x@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago
[โ€“] ghariksforge@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[โ€“] YellowtoOrange@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago

Apparently some sort of contract with google ran out yesterday

[โ€“] Blaiz0r@lemmy.ml -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sounds fair enough if you read some of the articles it's for accounts that read over 6000 posts a dayz so as to combat scraper bots.

Twitter has to manage 3rd parties paying for their API somehow

[โ€“] LetsGOikz@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

6000 tweets is only for people with Twitter Blue, and it counts scrolling past a series of tweets on your timeline as reading them, so it's really easy to hit that limit even as a paying bootlicker.

For those of us sane enough to not spend any money on that godforsaken platform, it's only 600 tweets, which is disgustingly easy to hit. Scroll a little through your timeline, open a few tweets to read replies, and you've hit your limit in less than 30 minutes.

[โ€“] Blaiz0r@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Sorry, your right it's 600 a day, but seriously I don't think that's a problem it's probably doing us a favour too.

I couldn't imagine spending 30 a day total on Twitter.

They want people to pay for the platform, this is how they're doing it.