this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2024
3 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19090 readers
4979 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] randon31415@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

MAGA SCOTUS justices in this case, MAGA judge in the classified docs case, MAGA prosecutor in the Georgia case ... good thing we hit him with four cases at the same time.

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 1 points 4 months ago

Fucking seriously. How stupid are we that people would see exactly what you laid out and just say "hmmm, oh well the justice system is just slow or something." Except its only with his cases that are in front of Republican appointed "judges."

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I don't know why anyone is surprised. All of the court watchers who aren't MAGA told us SCOTUS would sit on this as long as they possibly could. Which, assuming they're still coloring inside the rules, means the last ruling of the season. And they'll drag out all the other cases too so it doesn't look weird. In fact on Strict Scrutiny they've been warning that the court is dropping a bunch of no contest decisions because they're expecting one big drop with shitty partisan decisions that have no logic beyond the personal politics of the majority.

[–] hglman@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

That the charges weren't made until late last year is also a failure, the whole process has been unreasonable long.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

That was part of the game though. If any part of that process was sped up for him the Republicans would have ammo in their accusations about the trial. And rich people have long made sure the justice system goes slowly.

[–] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world -1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Part of "the game" is to make sure that the trial would start far too late for it to end before the elections... To make sure that Trump can get elected before the ruling is over... And then give himself immunity?

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Yes, but it's important to remember that there are multiple players in this game. The Democrats and the prosecutors want the trial done before then but they can't be seen to be speeding it up or even to be impatient. This gives the defense and the Republicans plenty of opening to show the trial down.

[–] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

This was entirely predictable. There was no reason for the Democrats to wait so long to start the process. They wanted to make sure Trump could run for the Republicans so they can keep fearmongering everyone into voting for Biden.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago

They did start the process very early though. The problem is there's a whole thing before bringing charges that they had to go through. They aren't skipping any step because that could be grounds for an appeal. Even before officially opening an investigation they had to make sure they had the grounds to do that. So there was an investigation before the investigation, likely trying to get something less ephemeral than speech=riot; like direct ties to fake electors. Then they can start the official investigation where they get people on the record in meetings with the FBI. Finally when that's gone far enough they can get a grand jury to look at everything. Then finally they can charge Trump and start preparing for a trial.

In both of the investigative phases anyone partial to Trump can slow them down by rescheduling repeatedly and lying to investigators. (Which has already resulted in charges for some of them because it's much easier to prove.) Then the grand jury doesn't usually meet every day, in fact they may only meet once a week.

Taking two years to figure out there was a connection, and another year to gather enough evidence for a grand jury isn't unusual. Especially in cases involving rich and influential people.

[–] xenomor@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

As an organization, they are actively and intentionally interfering with electoral politics. Their lifetime appointments were designed to remove them from that dynamic, but they have decided to bypass that principle. The structure of our federal government is designed to deal with problems like this by having the other branches check them when they step out of line like this. Unfortunately, neither of the other branches have shown any desire to take action. As a result we are currently caught in a self-reinforcing death spiral of anti-democratic corruption that will eventually undo the union unless something changes. What a time to be alive.

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I think we are supposed to be that something that changes it.

[–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Peaceful protesting only works for so long.

[–] Infynis@midwest.social 0 points 4 months ago (2 children)

That's where the second amendment actually does come in for once

[–] MagicShel@programming.dev 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

If you don't have enough people to win the war by picking up pens and voting, you definitely don't have enough to win by picking up guns and shooting.

[–] Steve@startrek.website 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] MagicShel@programming.dev 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

No. You're going to have to walk me through the thought process that led you to ask that. My whole point is if you can't win through voting, don't try to start a war because you aren't going to win that either.

[–] Steve@startrek.website 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Sorry that was half a thought. The country is divided 50/50, both sides see themselves as good and the other evil. Anyone starts shooting and you got a civil war.

[–] Crikeste@lemm.ee -1 points 4 months ago

Republicans have already started shooting. Just look at the rise in hate crimes over the last 8 years.

[–] Crikeste@lemm.ee -1 points 4 months ago

It’s the literal reason for the 2nd amendment, there is no arguing that fact.

[–] cmoney@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

How can we word this so tRump gets his way but also so Biden doesn't get immunity and when will I get another luxury vacation or motorhome?

Clarence Thomas probably.

[–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)
[–] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Lula's Brazil had Bolsonaro handled within six months. Banned him from running until 2030 over his January 8th coup attempt in 2023.

The failure to respond in 2021 doomed us all.

[–] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (3 children)

These trials could have started far sooner. But they were intentionally delayed by Democrats.

The Democrats purposely did not prosecute Trump in time because they do not want anyone else than Trump to be running.

Imagine if they couldn't "But Trump" right now.

[–] ssladam@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago (2 children)

You give the Dems too much credit. It's easier to believe they're weak and ineffectual.

[–] solomon42069@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

By design. The duopoly of American politics is firmly controlled by the rich, they stir up drama to get the public's approval for their side hustles.

[–] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago

Huh no of course not. They literally propped up Trump in 2016

So to take Bush down, Clinton’s team drew up a plan to pump Trump up. Shortly after her kickoff, top aides organized a strategy call, whose agenda included a memo to the Democratic National Committee: “This memo is intended to outline the strategy and goals a potential Hillary Clinton presidential campaign would have regarding the 2016 Republican presidential field,” it read.

“The variety of candidates is a positive here, and many of the lesser known can serve as a cudgel to move the more established candidates further to the right. In this scenario, we don’t want to marginalize the more extreme candidates, but make them more ‘Pied Piper’ candidates who actually represent the mainstream of the Republican Party,” read the memo.

“Pied Piper candidates include, but aren’t limited to: • Ted Cruz • Donald Trump • Ben Carson We need to be elevating the Pied Piper candidates so that they are leaders of the pack and tell the press to [take] them seriously."

[–] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

The Dems did fuck up, just not exactly as you describe. The Dems elected a neoliberal who appointed a conservative Attorney General. He did exactly what you'd expect a conservative AG to do and paved the way for Trump to return to power.

[–] RadioFreeArabia@lemmy.cafe -2 points 4 months ago

This is most probably what's really happening. The same way Democrats try to get right wing extremists in Republican primaries to win because they see them as easier to win against.

Wow, I wonder what it could be? It couldn’t possibly be that fucking everything anyone who’s been paying attention to the judicial system has been saying in the last 8 years for the past 8 years is all true, could it…?

For real though I’m getting real fuckin sick of being proven right on this whole realm of issues.

[–] yournamehere@lemm.ee -1 points 4 months ago

it is in USA DNA: drama! trump is like a stupider britney...just without the skills or skin...and it will all cumulate to sth. bizarre. may convict trump will shave his head or drive down square garden DWI...we dont know yet but it will be bizarre.