this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2024
2 points (100.0% liked)

Memes

45681 readers
639 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Context:

Somebody made a post promoting the proprietary search engine they are working on, claiming in the post that it "would make Stallman smile". In a comment below the post they said that they made the statement about Stallman to "drive engagement". The post was later removed for promoting proprietary software.

Image description:

At the top is a screenshot from the modlog saying:

Removed Post We're building a search engine to compete with DuckDuckGo. No JS, no WASM, no spying. Just a statically generated results page.
reason: Comm rule 2: Don’t promote proprietary software

Below that is an image of Stallman smiling.

top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] pixelscript@lemmy.ml 2 points 8 months ago

I replied to that thread.

OP was claiming to be working on a static HTML-serving search engine. They suggested that because it's just HTML and CSS, and that interested parties can use Inspect Element to read the network requests, that it constituted "open source".

Commenters then got on his case about not open sourcing the server backend. OP defended that choice saying they didn't want a competitor taking their code and building a company off of it that would "drive [them] out of business". Uh-huh. So, proprietary software, then. Bye.

[–] 404@lemmy.zip 1 points 8 months ago

Some commenter asked why they were using Brave. I saved it to check out the answer later, because I was curious, but now I'll never know :(

[–] superduperenigma@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

proprietary search engine

it "would make Stallman smile"

So do they just know absolutely nothing about RMS?