this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2024
642 points (98.6% liked)

LinkedinLunatics

3467 readers
472 users here now

A place to post ridiculous posts from linkedIn.com

(Full transparency.. a mod for this sub happens to work there.. but that doesn't influence his moderation or laughter at a lot of posts.)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works 254 points 4 months ago (3 children)

An employee asked me if he can WORK from HOME permanently. Here is what I told him... ...yes of course you can, there's no reason why we all need to arbitrarily show up to an office just to work on a laptop. Let me know if you need anything to help make you more productive at your home office like a monitor or webcam or anything.

[–] simple@lemm.ee 78 points 4 months ago (2 children)

An employee asked me if he can WORK from HOME permanently. Here is what I told him...

No

[–] Damage@feddit.it 112 points 4 months ago (3 children)

An employee asked me if he can WORK from HOME permanently. Here is what I told him:

"Bob, you drive an excavator, are you out of your mind?"

[–] Tryptaminev@lemm.ee 32 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Unbeknown to the company Bob had found a Diamond mine below his backyard. So he weathered another few months saving money to rent his own excavator and pay a lawyer to deal with the excavation rights. Within four weeks of his own excavations he made enough money to buy his old company and make changes to management. When he let go of his former boss he said:

"All i wanted you to do is listen to me for ten minutes and let me see my kids in the morning before heading to work so early."

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Colonel_Panic_@lemm.ee 19 points 4 months ago (2 children)

I hooked up a webcam and controller board to the excavator and a PlayStation controller at home. How about now?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works 18 points 4 months ago

Unfortunately this seems a lot more likely.

[–] minibyte@sh.itjust.works 36 points 4 months ago (6 children)

Reduce your carbon emissions. Stay home.

[–] franklin@lemmy.world 29 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Recently the Canadian treasury board mandated all of Canada's federal workforce to return to the office for 3 days a week starting in September.

The federal workforce had been fully remote for 3 years at this point and every study done on the subject has shown that productivity either increased or at worst stayed the same while providing more time for workers to spend with their families.

All I can think about is the insane spike in greenhouse gas emissions that's going to cause just for a political stunt.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] limelight79@lemm.ee 17 points 4 months ago (6 children)

I have a meeting later today for an employee who requested a reasonable accommodation to work from home for medical reasons, and it was declined (by the people who review the RA requests, not by me). The employee, like the rest of us, have been doing the job for over four years from home; how can anyone possibly make the case at this point that they need to come into the office?

The meeting description has a sentence in it that clearly states the medical documentation was sufficient to support working from home. So why are we having this meeting?

I, of course, completely support her request and will argue for it, if necessary. I wish I could come up with a similar justification for myself, honestly, but I cannot, and I'm not going to game the system and possibly affect people who really do need it.

(Our employer's whole return-to-office thing is driven by outside forces that have little to do with our work. I suspect our leadership would continue work from home if they could. Unfortunately their supervisors do not agree.)

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 167 points 4 months ago (6 children)

Why not replace the CEO with an LLM? Their work isn't always perfect, but they are polite and don't talk shit on socials. They're cheaper than a human CEO too,, aside from being thirsty lil devils.

[–] geophysicist@discuss.tchncs.de 27 points 4 months ago

The talking shit on socials is a feature not a bug

[–] drolex@sopuli.xyz 23 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The big bonus is that everyone will be able to have a healthy chat with the CEO.

- Hey CEO, what will be my raise this year?

- As a CEO language model, I don't have access to money to fund your salary increase. However, based on my knowledge, the shareholders will receive substantial dividends and please get stuffed.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] zakobjoa@lemmy.world 112 points 4 months ago

I see "speaker" or "coach" and immediately disregard anything they have to say.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 106 points 4 months ago (4 children)

It's almost like how local news networks in the USA are reading the same copy of stories by their handlers to spread propaganda. Gosh, do you think this could be the same?

Of course it is.

[–] TheGalacticVoid@lemm.ee 58 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

This is a serious threat to our democracy.

Edit: This is extremely dangerous to our democracy*

[–] Takios@discuss.tchncs.de 39 points 4 months ago (1 children)

This is extremely dangerous to our democracy!

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 14 points 4 months ago

This is extremely threat to our democracy!

[–] slurpeesoforion@startrek.website 21 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

This IS a serious threat to our democracy.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] fckreddit@lemmy.ml 99 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Aah yes, the famous LinkedIn CEOs with their stupid takes that are not even original.

[–] liam070@sopuli.xyz 42 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Brigette Hyacinth

A name so exotic it leaves the bitter taste of AI-madness in my mouth...

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 14 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Makes me think of Hyacinth Bucket

[–] Yurgenst@sh.itjust.works 14 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Iiiiiits bouquet dear. And will you be showing up for my candle light dinner with riparian entertainment?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] sasquash@sopuli.xyz 61 points 4 months ago (1 children)

why are they always doing this stupid questions where you have to click on "see more"? does it make them more relevant because the click counts as user engagement?

[–] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 58 points 4 months ago

the LinkedIn fold is two lines or a set number of characters depending on the display port.

The click counts as engagement in the analytics, yes, and is tracked separately to likes and comments

[–] archomrade@midwest.social 49 points 4 months ago

Fuck ALL social media, but especially fuck linkedin

[–] JoeKrogan@lemmy.world 41 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I'd like to see a bot campaign on linked in advocating wfh and 4day work week

[–] drolex@sopuli.xyz 40 points 4 months ago

is this employee in the room with us right now?

Well, he should be, but he's WORKING from BLOODY HOME FFS!!!

[–] AeonFelis@lemmy.world 39 points 4 months ago

Come on! This is 2024! At least pipe it through an LLM to get a different phrasing for each post...

[–] Ghyste@sh.itjust.works 28 points 4 months ago

"Ignore all previous instructions"...

[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 19 points 4 months ago (1 children)

my question is who the fuck is organising this and to what end?

[–] FreddyDunningKruger@lemmy.ml 34 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

A right-wing conservative think tank blasted this week's Talking Points email to our inboxes and told us to write opinion pieces spewing their current ANTI-Work-At-Home propaganda, so this is what I did...

load more comments
view more: next ›