this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2024
78 points (90.6% liked)

Green - An environmentalist community

5141 readers
24 users here now

This is the place to discuss environmentalism, preservation, direct action and anything related to it!


RULES:

1- Remember the human

2- Link posts should come from a reputable source

3- All opinions are allowed but discussion must be in good faith


Related communities:


Unofficial Chat rooms:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TheOubliette@lemmy.ml 24 points 1 week ago

This is direct price to the consumer at a store, not the cost of production. These things are different due to subsidies and externalities. Animal agriculture tends to have a lot of both.

[–] Zier@fedia.io 17 points 1 week ago

Why is my Tofu not on the chart!!!

[–] thefluffiest@feddit.nl 15 points 1 week ago

Monetary cost is the wrong y-axis here, as it optimkzes only for mega-scale farming without taking its real costs in consideration. It should be ‘true cost’, which also accounts for environmental-, animal- and climate mitigation cost.

[–] odium@programming.dev 14 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Peanuts aren't a nut? I feel deeply betrayed.

[–] Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

not in a biological sense no. peanuts and almonds are legumes.

Basically there is a difference between the biological and the culinary definition for some foods. For instance a common example is that bananas are berries, and neither strawberries nor raspberries are berries biologically, However the culinary definition would treat them as the oppisite. same idea with Tomatoes (biologically a fruit, culinarily a vegetable)

[–] protist@mander.xyz 6 points 1 week ago

Almonds are nuts, they're the seeds of the almond tree.

[–] TheOubliette@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 week ago

You can't escape BEAN

[–] culprit@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 week ago

Legendary Legume Lifeforce

[–] oktoberpaard@feddit.nl 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

In my opinion it’s more useful to look at grams of protein per kcal. You can only eat so many calories in a day, so that dictates your protein intake for a large part. If you eat 2000 kcal worth of peanuts, you’d ingest 80 grams of protein. With chickpeas that would be 110 grams and with chicken breast 425 grams. You don’t eat just protein rich things, so the higher the value, the higher your chances of ingesting enough protein when combined with (other) vegetables, grains, rice, oil, etc.

I know that some people will read this comment as if I’m promoting meat consumption, so let me add that I firmly believe that the world would be a better place if we ate a lot less meat. I’m just using these examples for demonstration purposes, as they’re all at the right side of the graph. It’s always an option to supplement with a plant based protein powder.

[–] reallyzen@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Can we have the same with the other components? Like Fats, Fibers, Glucids...

[–] delirious_owl@discuss.online 2 points 1 week ago

But do it right next time, not ignoring subsidies and environmental cost.