this post was submitted on 28 May 2024
403 points (99.3% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

6018 readers
1064 users here now

A community for your defence shitposting needs

Rules

1. Be niceDo not make personal attacks against each other, call for violence against anyone, or intentionally antagonize people in the comment sections.

2. Explain incorrect defense articles and takes

If you want to post a non-credible take, it must be from a "credible" source (news article, politician, or military leader) and must have a comment laying out exactly why it's non-credible. Random twitter and YouTube comments belong in the Low Hanging Fruit thread.

3. Content must be relevant

Posts must be about military hardware or international security/defense. This is not the page to fawn over Youtube personalities, simp over political leaders, or discuss other areas of international policy.

4. No racism / hatespeech

No slurs. No advocating for the killing of people or insulting them based on physical, religious, or ideological traits.

5. No politics

We don't care if you're Republican, Democrat, Socialist, Stalinist, Baathist, or some other hot mess. Leave it at the door. This applies to comments as well.

6. No seriousposting

We don't want your uncut war footage, fundraisers, credible news articles, or other such things. The world is already serious enough as it is.

7. No classified material

Classified information is off limits regardless of how "open source" and "easy to find" it is.

8. Source artwork

If you use somebody's art in your post or as your post, the OP must provide a direct link to the art's source in the comment section, or a good reason why this was not possible (such as the artist deleting their account). The source should be a place that the artist themselves uploaded the art. A booru is not a source. A watermark is not a source.

9. No low-effort posts

No egregiously low effort posts. These include Social media screenshots with a title punchline / no punchline, recent (after the start of the Ukraine War) reposts, simple reaction & template memes, and images with the punchline in the title. Put these in weekly Low effort thread instead.

10. Don't get us banned

No brigading or harassing other communities. Do not post memes with a "haha people that I hate died… haha" punchline or violating the sh.itjust.works rules (below). This includes content illegal in Canada.


Join our Matrix chatroom


Other communities you may be interested in


Banner made by u/Fertility18

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] nuke@sh.itjust.works 69 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Less bloodshed... for us

Way way more bloodshed for you

[–] Shipgirlboy@sh.itjust.works 60 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The purpose of a soldier is not to die for his country, it is to make the other dumb bastards die for theirs.

[–] bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

spoilerasdfasfasfasfas

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Username rather pointedly relevant

[–] Zorque@kbin.social 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Pretty sure the blood gets vaporized before it can be shed.

[–] psud@aussie.zone 1 points 1 month ago

I think enhanced radiation weapons make for plenty of blood

[–] FireTower@lemmy.world 39 points 1 month ago

Maxim's inspiration:

“I was in Vienna, where I met an American whom I had known in the States,” Maxim told the Times of London. “He said: ‘Hang your chemistry and electricity! If you want to make a pile of money, invent something that will enable these Europeans to cut each other’s throats with greater facility.’ ”

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I doubt that this is even remotely accurate. Even the slightest bit of critical thinking quickly dismantles that "belief".

[–] hydroptic@sopuli.xyz 45 points 1 month ago (1 children)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Jordan_Gatling#Gatling_gun

In 1877, he wrote, "It occurred to me that if I could invent a machine gun which could by its rapidity of fire, enable one man to do as much battle duty as a hundred, that it would, to a large extent supersede the necessity of large armies, and consequently, exposure to battle and disease would be greatly diminished."

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Why would he not realize that countries, generals, kings, and those in power would simply send more men to die? They will not send 2 guys with a machine gun and then simply accept that the battle was lost if their guy loses. No, they will send a million men, as many as are needed to take another foot of ground.

[–] BeMoreCareful@lemmy.world 37 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Colonialism was super popular, so a couple of dudes with machine guns could mow down a field of natives with much less risk.

Plus a machine gun is much more impressive than some dudes with single fire guns. A platoon (or whatever fits on a boat or three) can be overrun. Throw a couple of machine guns in with a couple of brutal shows of force and you got yourself a colony.

WW1 was still a ways off and it wasn't really the target market for your Gatlings and Maxims.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 24 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That's actually a really good point. He must have meant that fewer "civilized" soldiers would die.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 12 points 1 month ago

It's more likely he just didn't think of them at all.

[–] hydroptic@sopuli.xyz 8 points 1 month ago

¯\_ (ツ)_/¯

He was clearly not a stupid man by any means, but definitely seems like he was naive.

[–] FireTower@lemmy.world 35 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's the cotton gin logic. Eli Whitney thought his invention the cotton gin would reduce the need for manual labor on cotton plantations and reduce slavery. Instead it made cotton farming more profitable and revitalized slavery.

[–] sushibowl@feddit.nl 5 points 1 month ago

I think this is an instance of Jevon's paradox.

[–] Annoyed_Crabby@monyet.cc 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

He didn't said which side and how though, so the statement of "reducing number of soldier" could be true to the side using the gatling and also the side getting shot at.

[–] MaggiWuerze@feddit.de 8 points 1 month ago

Yeah, the first one starts with less and the second one ends up with les

[–] halvar@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago

Csávó tiszta hülye vágod