Why not investigate all of them on a regular basis, while we're at it? They have terms for life, we should probably make sure none of them are taking bribes or are otherwise unreasonably biased on on cases they rule on.
this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2023
22 points (100.0% liked)
Politics
10187 readers
128 users here now
In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it's a political happening, you can post it here.
Guidelines for submissions:
- Where possible, post the original source of information.
- If there is a paywall, you can use alternative sources or provide an archive.today, 12ft.io, etc. link in the body.
- Do not editorialize titles. Preserve the original title when possible; edits for clarity are fine.
- Do not post ragebait or shock stories. These will be removed.
- Do not post tabloid or blogspam stories. These will be removed.
- Social media should be a source of last resort.
These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.
Subcommunities on Beehaw:
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
With such an extreme reach of power, it would be reasonable to expect little privacy in the matters of wealth and professional conduct.
We investigated ourselves and found we did nothing wrong
Don't forget: congress checking the power of the supreme court is an unacceptable violation of the principle of checks and balances, at least if you ask John Roberts about it. Luckily he's totally unbiased on this issue.
Hope the Dems are smart enough to frame it that all justices will be investigated, not just Thomas
Obligatory “it’s about time”