this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2023
61 points (100.0% liked)

Science

9 readers
8 users here now

This magazine is dedicated to discussions on scientific discoveries, research, and theories across various fields, including physics, chemistry, biology, astronomy, and more. Whether you are a scientist, a science enthusiast, or simply curious about the world around us, this is the place for you. Here you can share your knowledge, ask questions, and engage in discussions on a wide range of scientific topics. From the latest breakthroughs to historical discoveries and ongoing research, this category covers a wide range of topics related to science.

founded 2 years ago
 

Four volunteer crew members entered a Mars-realistic 3D printed habitat.

top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mack123@kbin.social 12 points 1 year ago

We still have a lot to learn of the psychology of the situation. Results from these studies are always interesting. Even if it is far from the real thing.

It is also a perfect starting point for a post apocalyptic novel. "The only group to survive the end was a small band of researchers, stuck in their isolation experiment."

[–] Soki@beehaw.org 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They did a similar thing before. Not sure if this would be super cool to do, or super boring.

[–] Flaky_Fish69@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Also the biosphere 2 missions.

Those…. Ended “well”.

[–] osarusan@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

True, but the bio-dome project was a smashing success!

[–] Lenguador@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I wonder what specifically they're interested in vs long deployments in Antarctica (people do 12 months rotations in some stations there).

I found this article discussing the psychology of placements in Australian antarctic stations: https://psychology.org.au/for-members/publications/inpsych/2021/february-march-issue-1/life-in-the-australian-antarctic-program.

The differences as I see them are:

  1. Smaller crew
  2. No unsuited outdoor time
  3. Smaller space
  4. Communication latency / outages
  5. Personal belongings weight/volume limits
  6. Dietary restrictions
[–] Jon-H558@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

those doing a antartic winter may as well have the no suited outdoor time, poor clothing choice will be death almost as quick

[–] parrot-party@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Antarctica trips have all of those limits you mentioned, they'll just be worse for Mars. While they can operate sort of freely for a few months, once winter sets in, they are just as isolated as another planet. They just get the advantage of easier setup then Mars.

[–] RodPhoto@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'm thinking a lot of the equipment is different as well, and since they mention simulating equipment malfunctions, that plays an important part, especially with the additional limitations/simulated dangers.

[–] Gentlegrrl@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

I think there are easier ways to reduce your screen time.

One of my favorite Twilight Zone episodes

[–] FantasticFox@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Do we actually intend to send humans to Mars in any reasonable timeframe?

[–] RodPhoto@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

I guess that depends on what you consider reasonable. I figure if they're starting with simulations such as this now, it's reasonable to expect an actual manned mission in maybe 20 years.

[–] Ganondorf@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Hard to say - There's still a lot of hazards yet to be accounted for: a lot more radiation exposure, literal poison in the soil, severe weather, safe and affordable supply chain, etc.

load more comments
view more: next ›