this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2023
19 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37717 readers
397 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The virtual world, a strange cross between Burning Man and Neal Stephenson’s metaverse, marks its 20th anniversary with no true corporate competitor in sight.

top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] spartanatreyu@programming.dev 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

No competitor?

What about VRChat?

Yes it has a tenth the users, but it's also designed around an expensive peripheral you strap to your face which prices out a lot of users.

[–] i_am_not_a_robot@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

VRChat is very different. Neos or Cluster are more like Second Life. VRChat doesn't have inventory items or attachments or persistent worlds or in-world creation tools.

The problem with a successor to Second Life is that most companies now want to make completely sterile, family and advertiser friendly environments. Even Linden Lab has done this with their recent projects.

[–] Tokeli@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Linden Lab's Sansar was their one attempt and it flopped so hard that they came back to desperately put their effort into SecondLife once more.

[–] PelicanPersuader@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A substantial chunk of the reason why it flopped was because they banned sex. SL continues to thrive in good part due to its liberal embrace of sexual content. It would have died out years ago without that. Companies that want to make virtual worlds never learn that lesson.

[–] Tokeli@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

As someone who makes an actual (meager) living off helping fuel SL's continued sexual content, that's one thing that every virtual world ever since has flopped on. They wanna be family and advertiser friendly. People don't want to be though. Sex sells, better than anything else does.

[–] KidDogDad@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Can I ask what you do to make that living? An ex of mine spent some time in SL a few years ago so I got to experience some of it mostly second hand. Such a fascinating place.

[–] Tokeli@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I make and sell... penises! Very advanced ones. Kinda sucks because sure not something you can slap on a resume.

[–] KidDogDad@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

Very cool. I might have to go look up how that even works. Thanks for sharing!

[–] interolivary@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

… now I'm curious as to what an "advanced penis" is 😅

[–] PelicanPersuader@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

That's why Sansar not allowing it really surprised me. SL has a decent grip on moderating and working with sexual content, something most companies don't have. The fear of sexual content and how to manage it shouldn't be something Linden Lab grapples with. I guess they wanted to test whether their product was appealing without it and ultimately the answer was no.

[–] jadedctrl@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 year ago

Missed the chance for the title “There will never be a second Second Life,” real shame.

[–] TemporaryBoyfriend@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

It still exists? Weird. I played with it for like, a weekend, and that was plenty.