The companies will also have to meet additional transparency obligations, including related to ads, and providing access to data for researchers.
Yeah, you know, for science
this post was submitted on 19 Apr 2024
30 points (96.9% liked)
Europe
8484 readers
1 users here now
News/Interesting Stories/Beautiful Pictures from Europe πͺπΊ
(Current banner: Thunder mountain, Germany, π©πͺ ) Feel free to post submissions for banner pictures
Rules
(This list is obviously incomplete, but it will get expanded when necessary)
- Be nice to each other (e.g. No direct insults against each other);
- No racism, antisemitism, dehumanisation of minorities or glorification of National Socialism allowed;
- No posts linking to mis-information funded by foreign states or billionaires.
Also check out !yurop@lemm.ee
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
I can legitimately say that I visited a porn site for research! Nothing sciency, though, just a project that regularly calculates which country has the most porn actresses per capita.
"These specific obligations include submitting risk assessment reports to the Commission, putting in place mitigation measures to address systemic risks linked to the provision of their services," it said in a statement.
I feel like systemic risks from lack of pornography from said platforms until a replacement can show up are rather limited.
This isn't quite Gazprom here.
Whoa! Thatβs some profit limiting legislation in action.
Is it? In the end, itβs about trying to get them to take responsibility for the content they host and the services they provide. Just like the DMA does for all other providers.
I should have used an /s flag on the post, it was meant as sarcasm.