this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2023
44 points (71.2% liked)

World News

32287 readers
535 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The report is absolutely scathing. Some choice quotes:

But when the next crisis came, both the US and the governments of Europe fell back on old models of alliance leadership. Europe, as EU high representative for foreign affairs Josep Borrell loudly lamented prior to Russia’s invasion, is not really at the table when it comes to dealing with the Russia-Ukraine crisis. It has instead embarked on a process of vassalisation.

But “alone” had a very specific meaning for Scholz. He was unwilling to send Leopard 2 tanks to Ukraine unless the US also sent its own main battle tank, the M1 Abrams. It was not enough that other partners would send tanks or that the US might send other weapons. Like a scared child in a room full of strangers, Germany felt alone if Uncle Sam was not holding its hand.

Europeans’ lack of agency in the Russia-Ukraine crisis stems from this growing power imbalance in the Western alliance. Under the Biden administration, the US has become ever more willing to exercise this growing influence.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] barsoap@lemm.ee 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Like a scared child in a room full of strangers, Germany felt alone if Uncle Sam was not holding its hand.

From another angle Germany twisted the US' arm until they did what we wanted them to do. Atlanticism in Germany is right-wing, the SPD certainly has its faults but worshipping the US is not one of them.

The nations of Europe are not currently capable to defend themselves and so they have no choice but to rely on the US in a crisis

Against who? Aliens? Who is this hypothetical enemy that can invade Europe? Capabilities aren't exactly as they should be, it would be nasty going against a rogue US, yes, but we could still bring the whole thing to a stalemate even if it would necessitate a couple of French nukes getting dropped on carrier groups.

...and don't get me started on them wanking off to the dollar value of US contributions. Much of what they send should be valued negatively (in monetary terms) because it's surplus and they're saving on disposal costs. Meanwhile, if the EU had the US' ammunition production capacity Ukraine would've run out by now.

The US has been pussy-footing around this whole conflict, see e.g. the row about ATACMs, the UK had to send Storm Shadow (which they don't exactly have a surplus of, to the contrary) to twist the US' arm.


What many analysts don't seem to get into their head, it just doesn't fit their framework, is that Europe as a whole is a lot more "hawkish" in this conflict than the US, leading to all kinds of misinterpretations. "But Europe is so peace-loving and warm and fuzzy" -- no, motherfucker, we hate imperialism. That's all there is to it. We have plenty of former Russian colonies in the union and with shit going down as it went, the western members finally understood that no, Russia can't be reasoned with, or even be counted on to act in self-interest, instead of chalking the eastern member's attitude up to PTSD.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago (13 children)

From another angle Germany twisted the US’ arm until they did what we wanted them to do. Atlanticism in Germany is right-wing, the SPD certainly has its faults but worshipping the US is not one of them.

The top EU think tank very clearly disagrees with you here. It's also pretty clear that Germany ended up being the big loser here given that it's now in a recession. So, I guess if that's what Germany wanted then it certainly did a brilliant job twisting US' arm to destroy German industry. Given that this has been the stated goal of US for years now, I don't think much twisting required here.

Against who? Aliens?

Europe wouldn't have anyone to defend itself against if it didn't keep creating enemies for itself. It was entirely possible to dismantle NATO after USSR collapsed and integrate Russia into Europe as an equal. Instead, Europe chose to have an antagonistic relationship with Russia, and now Europe finds itself in a protection racket situation.

Finally, the idea that Europe could fight US or Russia in an all out war is completely delusional. Europe lacks the industrial base to do this kind of warfare, and it also lacks access to energy. Meanwhile, if we're talking about nukes both US and Russia have literally an order of magnitude more nukes than all of Europe combined.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 15 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Yeah, but a lot of it comes from Europe not choosing to lead on any international crisis, to the point where it has intentionally designed its defense to require the US to participate.

I look at it like this, the EU should have its own independent military from NATO given its size and wealth. Yet, it chooses to be entirely dependent on NATO and needs the US to help in any sort of projection of force.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Becoming a vassal of the US is the direct consequences of that choice.

[–] FluffyPotato@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What are you talking about? Every country in Europe already has its own military and the EU has a defensive clause it the pact.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 5 points 1 year ago

Every country in Europe already has its own military And each American state has its own military as well that is controlled by the different governors.

and the EU has a defensive clause it the pact And the base for that defense pact is NATO headquarters. This is also only defense only, which makes cases where the EU needs to respond to threats on its frontier difficult because there is no organizing entity to handle this issue. And if the defense pact was the reason for inter-EU defense, it is going to be through the lens of NATO, which gives the US a pretty big say on EU defense.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That's a lot of words just to say "Germany hesitated about sending tanks to Ukraine therefore the US is now the colonial master of Europe."

Apparently that's all it takes. Just a slight hesitation on a decision and you lose all sovereignty forever.

Or maybe the hesitation over the tanks was a little disappointing, but not really that big a deal. Calm down people.

[–] redtea@lemmygrad.ml 15 points 1 year ago (3 children)

It was a bit late by then. Germany lost it's sovereignty right about the time the US turned up in Berlin to stop the Soviets from advancing any further.

If Germany really had sovereignty, would it really have done so little after it's 'allies' blew up Nordstream 2, causing German deindustrialisation and increasing German consumer and industrial energy insecurity?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago
[–] PanArab@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

We will see how it plays out long term, but it seems to me that the US is hollowing out Europe to enrich themselves in their economic war against China. If you don't believe that, look what the US is doing to encourage manufacturers to leave Europe and move to the US, or the fact that they overcharge Europe on fossil fuels.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›