this post was submitted on 24 Jun 2023
264 points (97.5% liked)

Programmer Humor

32371 readers
425 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] fubo@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago (1 children)

For a little historical context:

  • IPv6 became a draft standard in 1998, and did not officially lose the "draft" status until 2017.
  • Hurricane Electric launched their well-known IPv6 tunnel service in 2001.
  • Google has published IPv6 adoption stats since 2008. These stats consistently show a greater fraction of users are on IPv6 on the weekend, because it's more common on mobile and home networks than office networks.
[–] TCB13@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Unfortunately some ISPs are total garbage and don't support IPv6 in 2023. Eg. https://lemmy.world/comment/269250

My ISP forces me to choose between static IPv4 or non-routable IPv4+IPv6 😓

[–] frozen@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz 23 points 1 year ago

The solution to fix my development environment at my old job was disabling IPv6. Gives a good insight into the quality of the software...

[–] Dirk@lemmy.ml 19 points 1 year ago

Ah yes, the print server the whole company relies on.

[–] remram@lemmy.ml 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)

For whatever reason, to this day I get a 403 error on http://google.com/ from IPv6. https://www.google.com/ works through.

Sometimes it's not your side that is broken.

[–] SteveTech@programming.dev 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

http://google.com/ works fine for me, tested in Firefox and with curl -6. So it could actually be your side that is broken, although it is probably your ISP's.

[–] remram@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

My side works fine, Google just doesn't like the address. It's a tunnelbroker address, maybe they consider that bots... but only for some of their servers? It's weird

[–] SteveTech@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh okay, IMO IPv6 tunnels are worse than just disabling it, because it's basically just a proxy with IPv6, and since there's no encryption (at this layer) both your ISP and now the tunnel could collect your data, as well as added latency.

But I guess it's okay for experimentation or if you actually require IPv6 for something.

[–] remram@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hard disagree there. It is a tunnel, it is plenty fast if the intermediate node is close enough, and why would you want encryption at the IP layer.

It works great and gives me IPv6 that I otherwise wouldn't have with my ISP (Optimum), allowing me to connect to native IPv6 site and use all the IPv6 functionality I want (dedicated IPs for containers/VMs etc).

[–] SteveTech@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago

Yeah those are some good points, I guess I'm just spoilt with native IPv6.

[–] darkfiremp3@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

http://ipv6.google.com is a thing! If it works for you, you have working ipv6, if it doesn’t, you don’t!

[–] remram@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

I have IPv6, Google just doesn't like my address.

[–] itsmikeyd@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I have all sorts of weird troubles with IPv6 at home. Facebook won't load some content, Netflix will frequently buffer and fail to load, Steam will almost never download things quickly.

Turn off IPv6 on my router, all my troubles go away.

[–] gogozero@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

sounds like it may be a wonky dns server. if youre interested, try re-enabling ipv6 but use something like cloudflare's dns in lieu of your ISP's

[–] Bene7rddso@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago

Either that or the ISP's IPV6 routing is broken

[–] apearson@lemmy.mykhoury.com 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] axtualdave@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (3 children)

But ugh, ipv6 is haaarrrrd

[–] fluffman86@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago (3 children)

How hard would it have been to just add another octet or two? I like using my 10key and if I have to type letters for an IP address it's a bad system.

[–] apearson@lemmy.mykhoury.com 10 points 1 year ago

You'd still need to update and replace every system a packet would touch. Why just add another 8 or 16 bits and make it where we'd have to go through this entire painful process again? IPv6's design was "we never want to do this again".

An example of this "we never want to do this again" is only 1/8 of the v6 address space is currently marked usable for allocation. We have 7 more chances to change allocation methods without having to update or change any system.

[–] Adama@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Not to mention that we can “visualize” the segments and networks by the numbers. Makes it easier to recognize, as an analogy,

This state, that city, this road, that house.

Versus ipv6. Of course there’s so much space in v6 that it isn’t an issue except it’s such a pain to work with for people who tend to think in ipv4 octets and bit masks

[–] barsoap@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

There's way more to ipv6 than additional octets. I don't run ipv6 on my wlan (pretty much only for my mobile phone) because I can't be arsed to wrap my head around ipv6 autoconfig and NAT (or rather not NAT) whereas setting up dhcp is a breeze.

[–] i_am_hiding@aussie.zone 4 points 1 year ago

Unless I'm mistaken, it's also impossible for many - myself included. My ISP doesn't provide me with a public facing IPv6 address.

[–] bfg9k@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

It really isn't, but vendors often make the IPv6 config optional and often don't have an auto-config wizard for IPv6 like they often do for IPv4.

Take Ubiquiti EdgeOS, setting up a PPPoE with IPv4 has a dedicated GUI wizard that shows up when you first log on, but IPv6 config is all confusing CLI commands.

IPv6 is haaarrrrrd because vendors are lazy.

[–] theory@feddit.uk 9 points 1 year ago

Accurate label

[–] normonator@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago

I'm in Canada and none of the 3 ISPs I have available support ipv6 even on business connections.

You can probably guess the three and be wrong but also right, this is the case lots of places in Canada only less options.

[–] neoney@lemmy.neoney.dev 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

S920? I'd buy one to replace my rpi...

[–] agressivelyPassive@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

I have one, they're awesome.

I MacGyvered a 2.5" HDD into it and idling it draws 5W, while my pi 3 draws 4-5W, so definitely worth a try, if you can get a cheap one.

[–] catacomb@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago

Weird to see this, I had to do it this morning!

I have a fix to enable IPv6 but I'll do it after hours :)

[–] o_p@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Used to have an MSI wind back in the day, this looks exactly like it!

IPv6 is hard to wrap a head around first, but one I got it it's so nice to have it.

Imagine not having to do bottleneck which is reverse proxy for multiple local machines, just give them all different IPs.

load more comments
view more: next ›