I actually dont want another steam deck for another few years.
this post was submitted on 13 Apr 2024
80 points (94.4% liked)
PC Gaming
8305 readers
317 users here now
For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki
Rules:
- Be Respectful.
- No Spam or Porn.
- No Advertising.
- No Memes.
- No Tech Support.
- No questions about buying/building computers.
- No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
- No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
- No off-topic posts/comments.
- Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
I feel this. They already released the new OLED model. If/when they make a 2nd deck I'd want it so be a noticable upgrade
I don’t have one so an upgrade before I get one would be cool
Agree, with affordable GPUs so rare, we need developers to focus on low performance platforms like the steamdeck.
What if they offered an upgrade path? New main board, you keep your shell and storage.
Unlikely unfortunately, they don't currently offer replacement motherboards at all.
When the ifixit repair parts initially leaked, they had a replacement motherboard available but priced at $350. Later when ifixit officially started ordering repair parts, the motherboard was no longer available.
My guess is that it wasn't worth selling the motherboard for $350 when a 64gb deck was only $400. I'd imagine the same issue would apply to an "upgrade" motherboard.
Are they?
Why not? If you jump in now and get a deck you get better, more up to date hardware, as it should be. Also with a better chip its probably up to you if you want to use that to chase higher FPS and graphics or longer battery life.
What!? Why? You can keep playing your current one? I'd love to have better performance.
Having it as a benchmark is good, it encourages developers to aim to get good performance on a relatively underpowered device. I worry that an upgrade would muddy the waters... And drive games away from aiming for "verified" on the steam deck 1.
That's only an issue for folks who don't get the new one. The current one is feeling pretty underpowered already.
I haven't particularly felt mine is underpowered tbh. Obviously it's a handheld so it doesn't play the AAA graphics card melters on ultra haha. But yes, introducing a new one would affect everyone who doesn't upgrade... Plus of course the benchmark being low benefits PC players with weaker hardware, too. Budget players, in other words, who perhaps can't afford a £500+ upgraded deck. Seems a bit cold to just throw these folks under the bus.
That's the issue with bottom specced hardware. It's not future proof. It's falls out of the window of acceptable performance much faster. Look at the Horizon games. Zero Dawn plays great, Forbidden West does not.
At the bottom spec like the deck is, a two or three year refresh cadence is expected, unless they get to the point it hits in the middle of the performance window and has more leeway.
Yes, and that is exactly why having a low spec device as a common performance benchmark is useful. It extends the lifespan of low spec devices in general - at least if publishers think it's worth targeting the playerbase.
I fully agree. But that low spec benchmark needs to move up regularly to be useful.
The current steam deck can't even run Madden 24. I would say if your handheld can't run the current sports games then it's pretty underpowered.
Not a hardware issue. It won't run because EA don't allow their anti cheat to run on Linux.
You are talking out of your ass. The game "runs" just at horrible frame rate because the hardware isn't powerful enough.
Why lie?
I'm not lying, I'm just recounting information from ProtonDB, if it's wrong then sorry about that I suppose. I usually find it trustworthy.
If it breeds more competition and linux handhelds, good!