I mean, conservatives got roe v wade repealed and a bunch of other stupid shit moving us backwards instead of forward.
Pretty sure it ain't the progressives making themselves sad. It's the neanderthals dragging us backwards making us sad.
this post was submitted on 04 Apr 2024
8 points (100.0% liked)
U.S. News
2244 readers
31 users here now
News about and pertaining to the United States and its people.
Please read what's functionally the mission statement before posting for the first time. We have a narrower definition of news than you might be accustomed to.
Guidelines for submissions:
- Post the original source of information as the link.
- If there is any Nazi imagery in the linked story, mark your post NSFW.
- If there is a paywall, provide an archive link in the body.
- Post using the original headline; edits for clarity (as in providing crucial info a clickbait hed omits) are fine.
- Social media is not a news source.
For World News, see the News community.
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
"If Progressives just got on board with the fascist spiral of our racist country, they'd be as happy as Republicans are!"
What's the old saying, any article that ends in a question can be answered with "No".
I'm quite familiar with Betteridge. Strict adherence gets to your question; the larger issue, as with anything, is that so many question heds have been posed where the answer is "no" that it became a "law."
In journalism, there are problems that showed up far earlier than clickbait question heds, such as garden-path or irrelevant ledes. I've written and run question heds that were correct display copy atop stories in which the reporter tried to find an answer but couldn't given conflicting information from sources. At that point, the correct approach is a question.
Question heds atop stories that definitively disprove the question are lazy at best and disingenuous at worst. But to categorically remove a form of hed writing as valid based on statistics or anecdotal data isn't an improvement.
Gee, the wealth gap is even wider now than it was in the days of the robber barons, but I dunno... maybe I'm just making myself sad.
I mean, what does this author want us to do? Reframe every horror as "Well, it ain't that bad." until we're onboard with shrugging off the murder of children school, the murder of trans children, the murder of children in gaza, the homelessness of anyone, etc.
Is that an economist url?... yeah, no, not clicking that.
Typically the "financial type media", are full of political opinion instead of focusing on finance. Very often bad takes, and over the years, I've learned they just aren't worth a click, and my time.
All I would say to miserable progressives is: try being a proper leftist, then you'll know what real misery is like.
Really? I'd say I became happier as a leftist personally. Revolutionary optimism my dear comrade.
Yes, I agree. I said that rather tongue in cheek. 😅 It can be tough sometimes, but in the long run I know where I'd rather be. 😀
Research has found liberals to be more empathetic than conservatives, so in a troubled world one might expect them to be sadder. But a profound shift appears to be under way when it comes to excitement about change. “One of the fundamental traits of the conservative attitude is a fear of change, a timid distrust of the new as such,” wrote Friedrich Hayek in “The Constitution of Liberty” in 1960, “while the liberal position is based on courage and confidence, on a preparedness to let change run its course.”
of course we're not excited about change... shit's getting worse
Economist so often is just amoral false equivalence.
"Conservatives seem more excited about change."
No, conservatives seem excited about changing as much back to the way it was before. Progressives are sad because un-doing progress is significantly easier and faster than making progress.
Are the commentocracy making themselves broke?