this post was submitted on 20 Mar 2024
267 points (98.9% liked)

xkcd

8642 readers
15 users here now

A community for a webcomic of romance, sarcasm, math, and language.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

https://xkcd.com/2909

Alt text:

If you pick a low enough orbit, it gives you a lot of freedom to use a lightweight launch vehicle such as a stepladder.

top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] LazaroFilm@lemmy.world 18 points 6 months ago (1 children)

For option 4, they could have used a rope and just pulled it closer.

[–] psud@aussie.zone 17 points 6 months ago

The current Artemis 4 plan

Gateway

  • Two modules launched together to lunar near rectilinear halo orbit (NHRO)

Lander

  1. Starship lander launches to LEO
  2. Some large number of starship tankers (or few tankers doing many flights) refuel the lander
  3. Lander flies to NRHO, docks with gateway

Transport

  1. Crew launch and fly to NHRO in Orion
  2. Orion rendezvous with gateway
  3. Crew land using the lander, do stuff
  4. Crew ascend to NHRO in lander
  5. Lander rendezvous with gateway
  6. Crew return to Earth in Orion
[–] randomaccount43543@lemmy.world 15 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] towerful@programming.dev 11 points 6 months ago

it only depicts the means to reach the Moon, more suitable for robotic missions that are not required to return,^[racist comment implying that robots have no right to be repatriated]^

[–] Kinglink@lemmy.world 11 points 6 months ago

IF no one has thought of it, has it really been rejected?

[–] e_t_@kbin.pithyphrase.net 8 points 6 months ago

Simple! Just change the gravitational constant of the universe.

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 6 points 6 months ago

Makes sense to me. Just move the moon closer. 🤷🏻‍♂️

[–] Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

If you pull the Moon closer to the Earth, gravity will begin to disintegrate it and shred it into kwazillion asteroids that eventually become meteors bombard the Earth back to the lava age. Once that is done, the moon doesn’t exist and there’s no need to go to the moon ever again. Problem solved.

[–] OpenStars@startrek.website 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

That's not "fair"! Such an unbalanced relationship.

[–] towerful@programming.dev 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Damnit, wrong comment

[–] Wanderer@lemm.ee 3 points 6 months ago

Because the main goal was to beat the Russians to the moon. They also came up with a plan to fly astronauts to the moon then later devise a way to get them back.

[–] Amaltheamannen@lemmy.ml 2 points 6 months ago

Ive always preferred the idea of putting tugs with nuclear thermal rockers in orbit and using them to ferry things through cislunar space.

[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 2 points 6 months ago

"Potentially taking longer"

[–] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee 1 points 6 months ago

"Have your people talk to my people."

"...but I don't have any..."

"Well then go get some!"