this post was submitted on 08 Mar 2024
6 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

59653 readers
3596 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] middlemanSI@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

That's 3175 kg for non-free folk. My car has around 1600 kg. 7k pound car is a fat fat cow.

[–] AeonFelis@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

Natural selection

[–] GnuLinuxDude@lemmy.ml 1 points 8 months ago

My first car had a curb weight of 2400 lbs. It's absurd how fucking huge these planet-destroying, environment destroying, life destroying monstrosities have become.

[–] Thcdenton@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

Oooohh yeeeaaaahhhh!!!!

[–] rusticus@lemm.ee 1 points 8 months ago

Stupid post. 60,000 lb semi laughs.

[–] Encinos@dormi.zone 1 points 8 months ago

"The goliath-like GMC Hummer EV weighs a staggering 9,083 pounds, 2 tons more than a gas-guzzling H3."

I’m confused 'Murica, do you want freedom or not?

[–] 342345@feddit.de 1 points 8 months ago

Just get an even bigger car, it will keep you safe from those.

[–] nokturne213@sopuli.xyz 1 points 8 months ago

Tldr most guard rails are designed to stop vehicles under 5000lbs. Passenger vehicles are starting to exceed that, and EVs can weight 30% more than ICE vehicles.

[–] DevCat@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago (4 children)

There was a discussion a couple of years ago around gasoline taxes and how they are supposed to pay for roadway maintenance. The question came up about EVs. There were discussions about how to include EVs in the taxation system so they would pay for their fair share of the road. One of the options was to impose a tax attached to your vehicle registration based upon the weight of the vehicle. The greater the weight, the more wear and tear it produces on the road surface. This might be one solution to the barrier problem, namely moving the extra cost to the reason for the extra cost.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (3 children)

The "problem" with that tax is that if it's applied fairly, it gets very big very fast. The damage to the road goes up with weight, but not linearly. Not a square factor, either. Not even cube. It's to the fourth power.

Start applying that to long haul trucks and the whole industry will be bankrupt in a month. The implication being that we are all subsidizing that industry with taxes on roads. Including that one trucker with a "who is John Galt?" sticker on the back.

That said, this is also a very good argument for improving cargo trains to the point where most long haul trucking goes away.

[–] cogman@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

And frankly, I'm really ok with this.

Trains should be the backbone for shipping. They are WAY more fuel efficient, like 3 to 4x more efficient than shipping by truck. Rail requires far less maintenance. And there's always the option install a 3rd rail and use electricity instead of fossil fuels to ship.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Speaking of road tax, you know that bad-faith argument about how cyclists need to pay our "fair share?" Well, I would be happy to pay 1¢ for my 10 kg bicycle if everybody with a car had to pay fairly by weight^4^.

[–] Goronmon@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

No reason the tax had to scale exactly to match the damage though. At least make it painful enough so people consider whether a larger vehicle is worth it.

[–] BombOmOm@lemmy.world -1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Every mile an EV drives is already taxed as we already tax electricity consumption. There is no reason to add a tax for something already taxed.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world -1 points 8 months ago

Some states do exactly that, or did back in the day. 30-years ago in Oklahoma, an old 2-ton dump truck with an antique plate was $20, a new Corvette $600. I think Texas flipped that and charged by weight vs. value.

[–] dan1101@lemm.ee 1 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Yeah well let's quit making 7000 pound consumer vehicles. Small EVs would be more efficient and better for the environment because they need less materials to build and and less energy to recharge.

[–] Maeve@kbin.social 1 points 8 months ago

Congratulations, the fossil fuel industry just put a hit on you

[–] filister@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Judging by the general trend I don't think this is happening anytime soon. The overall car industry is obsessed with even bigger cars.

And even in Europe it is sickening to see those half buses on our roads. And this is especially true for big cities, where parking space is very limited and usually those cars occupy park space for 1.5-2 cars.

And knowing that the fertility rate is really going down I wonder what justifies those cars.

[–] kronarbob@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

There was once a legend about vehicle's size and ... Well...

5654842_700b-2152166632

[–] ThunderclapSasquatch@startrek.website 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Yeah but I'd like to visit my family and the nearest charging station is halfway across the state

[–] Pika@sh.itjust.works 0 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

If you are unable to find a charging station at some point halfway across the state you're either being too picky, or blind. I live in the middle of nowhere Maine and I can still find at least one electric vehicle charger per major town. Hell there is three of them in the town next over and it's not even considered one of our highly populated towns. I thought the same that you did until I actually looked up where charging stations are located I was pleasantly surprized

[–] ThunderclapSasquatch@startrek.website 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I live in Wyoming, having been to Maine, yall have an amazing and beautiful state but your definition of bumfuck no where is lacking. I checked the EV map again the ENTIRE QUATER of the state I live in that doesn't have a single charger is where my family lives. I down south near Colorado for reasons I don't want to get into right now but I want to be able to actually visit my family without having to take a plane between the two airports in Wyoming.

[–] Pika@sh.itjust.works 0 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

yea looking at wyoming I can see there is defo a lack of EV stations, it looks like for southern wyoming the longest stretch is between rock springs and Lareme, but that's mostly if you lack the ability to use super chargers. I can see how it would be a pain to use an EV in that case, doable but it would stretch it a little further than i would be comfortable with as well. That being said you would never catch me driving 3 hours one way to visit someone anyway lmao

[–] Soggy@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Plus, it's Wyoming. Famously the least densely populated state. That comes with some associated costs.

[–] ThunderclapSasquatch@startrek.website 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The benefits are great though, people leave you alone and living here is cheap

[–] Soggy@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Couldn't pay me to live that far from an ocean. Or good internet.

My internet is pretty solid actually.

[–] TengoHipo@lemm.ee 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

We just need to not have these big ass trucks for the general public. You don’t need a ford 350 with rims jacked up to show you have money. You are a pavement princess.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee -1 points 8 months ago

"But I need it for my work!"

You don't even have a toolbox on it. If it was an actual work truck, it would be a pickup with the bed replaced with one of those toolbox beds. Or you'd have a sprinter van like the actual plumbers and carpenters around here.

[–] Quexotic@infosec.pub 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Simple, if you buy a car that's too heavy for the existing infrastructure, you either pay for the improved infrastructure or take the risk yourself. The minivan that I drive the kids in is only 4,300 lb. If you're driving something heavier than that then, best of luck. I expect that if I'm driving a camper, and I fall off the road, I'm just done. Game over.

I don't expect infrastructure to adapt to the minority. That's not what it's for.

[–] ErwinLottemann@feddit.de 0 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

what about trucks? should these rails not work for big trucks? or are trucks a minority?

edit: trucks like the ones that transport goods not rednecks

[–] Zanz@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

Trucks are commercial vehicles. People driving commercial vehicles should be professionals and we should have required a commercial class c license for all light duty pickup trucks or SUVs. Anything that gets an emissions credit so they can have lower MPG for being a commercial vehicle should also be classed as a commercial vehicle for licensing purposes.

[–] Simon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Okay this makes no sense. What about semi trucks or anything commercial? Did we decide decades ago that they can just fuck off and die?

[–] Syn_Attck@lemmy.today 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Normal people have to read a booklet, memorize basic things, take a written test, take an eye test, and drive around the block. All can be done in the span of a day. License acquired, go drive whatever 9,000lb vehicle you want in the way you see fit.

Commercial vehicles require a commercial license to operate, which requires training and one at-fault accident may revoke their commercial license. Plus depending on the loads they carry they can be worth millions of tens of millions. That's why you don't typically see 53' flatbeds going 20 over the limit and weaving in and out of traffic. Sometimes it can get sketchy if they're close to their destination and it's a rush against their (electronically) mandated off-time, but also one speeding ticket can put their license at risk.