this post was submitted on 06 Mar 2024
251 points (99.2% liked)

politics

19097 readers
3885 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MsPenguinette@lemmy.world 68 points 8 months ago (6 children)

The takeaway for me as a leftist is that this indicates how dogshit Biden is but also how much more infininately dogshit Trump is.

We really are in the dogshitiest timeline

I guess it's cool that a few on the right are finally agreeing with progressives that Biden isn't the "radical leftist" that the fearmongerers have been pushing for the last 4 years.

[–] MeekerThanBeaker@lemmy.world 25 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Agree, 100%. The guy is friends with McConnell, which I'll never understand. How leftist can he be? He said they're friends even though they have "different political views." Ugh. Biden is what a Republican should be. And I'd be fine with that. Not the shitshow that the GOP is currently.

McConnell is pond scum. I'm okay with different political views, but I can't stand hypocritical turtleheads.

[–] atx_aquarian@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

I feel like this recent episode of Hidden Brain is a very relevant discussion about this topic.

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 16 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I was watching Sanders on The Colbert Report and was thinking what the timeline would look like if he hadn't gotten fucked over by the "It's Her Turn" team in 2016. I made myself sad because I think we'd be about half an Overton Window back towards sanity.

[–] CraigeryTheKid@lemm.ee 16 points 8 months ago (2 children)

or do you go back to 2000 with the "if Gore won"

[–] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 11 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Yup. Gore won and it was stolen because of some hanging chads.

[–] muffedtrims@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

Don't forget the pregnant Chads

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago (2 children)

IDK, I was there. Gore seemed like a pompous buffoon then, but he still had to be better than Mission Accomplished.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 1 points 8 months ago

I looked at Gore's congressional record in the years after the election. The guy is one of the most genuine public servants ever in federal office. He didn't invent the Internet, but he did create a key piece of legislation that led to the Internet as we know it. Few other politicians at the time would have ever thought to bother.

I don't know what his hypothetical presidency would have been like, exactly. Political pressures often force you to set aside idealism. That may not have allowed his post-election advocacy for global warming to be quite so prominent. What I do know is that we'd likely be in a better place as a nation if he had been in office.

[–] CraigeryTheKid@lemm.ee 0 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

oh, I am also "applying current feelings to a prior time" - I voted for Bush in 2000. I think I voted McCain in 2008 too? Or maybe Palin scared me away, I can't remember. I had also just moved, maybe I missed that election.

[–] billiam0202@lemmy.world 13 points 8 months ago (1 children)

We really are in the dogshitiest timeline

No, because in that timeline they won on Jan. 6th.

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 2 points 8 months ago

Maybe that's just a different level, like this is the dogshittiest but your scenario is the satansdickiest.

Unless you're into that kind of stuff of course, not yuckin anyones yum.

:P

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago

We really are in the dogshitiest timeline

Nah, in some other slightly darker timeline the two candidates are Trump and Gym Jordan.

[–] Wogi@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago

Be the radical leftist they're so afraid of.

Push the conversation as far left as they've pushed it right, no, much, much further. To absolutely insane territory.

Compromise isn't ever going to work, so fuck it. Make unreasonable demands. Demand true universal healthcare for all, including illegal aliens currently on the run for violent crimes. Demand paid parental leave for full time stay at home parents. Demand access to 95th trimester abortions if being a parent just ain't working for you. Mandatory sex Ed every year starting at Pre-K, taught exclusively by drag queens and pre-op trans people.

Become unhinged.

[–] dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works 6 points 8 months ago

infininately dogshit, you say?

[–] Krauerking@lemy.lol 19 points 8 months ago

Oh hey look. A rich group that really didn't like Trump enought to try and support a longshot decided to be rational enough to swap their funds over to Biden.

That's what this story is, and I guess it's nice to see.
They have accepted reality is between those two and probably as much as they hate and still have Nikki's name on it (which I doubt she likes and is gonna change real soon), are pushing for the only rational enough choice when stuck between the 2.

[–] Everythingispenguins@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago

So I take it is she not getting the VP spot /s

[–] WarmSoda@lemm.ee -2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)
[–] Brunbrun6766@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

And what would you have them do? Protest vote green or some other useless shit?

[–] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Honestly I don't even know why I said that. I'm deleting it. I think I misread it and responded harshly in the wrong way.