this post was submitted on 03 Mar 2024
-14 points (31.6% liked)

politics

19102 readers
4341 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] carl_dungeon@lemmy.world 28 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Who the fuck is switching to trump, especially now? Jesus Christ, I’m starting to feel like people deserve that motherfucker.

[–] return2ozma@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago

Michael Moore explained why Trump would win before the 2016 General. It's still relevant today. I don't know how else to unbrainwash Trumpers though because they're being duped.

https://youtu.be/vMm5HfxNXY4

[–] TransSynthesist@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Polls are easily, and usually are, skewed or produced in a way to get the desired result. Anyways.... This one is garbage, too.

Siena College is a Catholic institution.

Of course a group of lgbtq+/women-hating nationalist Christians say the party that is against them is losing votes and doing poorly.

Future use: If you see "Siena College and Poll" in the same article ... it's garbage.

[–] Hyperreality@kbin.social 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Polls are easily, and usually are, skewed or produced in a way to get the desired result. Anyways… This one is garbage, too.

I have a related degree and have done polling in the past.

You're using an ad hominem about the New York Times being secret Catholic Trump supporters, because you don't like the results of the poll, but don't know enough about polling or statistics to attack the poll's methodology. People are upvoting you for the same reasons.

Anyway, the full results and methodology are here:

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2024/03/03/us/elections/times-siena-poll-registered-voter-crosstabs.html

Here's a website that aggregates polling on Biden's popularity from multiple pollsters:

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2024/03/03/us/elections/times-siena-poll-registered-voter-crosstabs.html

Of course a group of lgbtq+/women-hating nationalist Christians say the party that is against them is losing votes and doing poorly.

Why would they want to make it seem like a tight race and that Biden might lose? That's likely to increase turnout of voters who don't want that to happen.

If you want to depress turnout of democratic voters, you would produce polls that say Biden's almost certain to win.

[–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago (2 children)

One drawback of Lemmy is the notable tendency for people to use the downvote button as "I don't like what this says"

[–] kylie_kraft@lemmy.world 20 points 8 months ago (1 children)

it's at least partially to do with the poster, isn't it? this guy is posting any and all Biden concern troll pieces, around the clock, and it's rather exhausting.

[–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

Hot take of the day: You're probably right in this case, but the label of "concern troll" generally does more harm than good because its liberal application often has the effect of stifling genuine conversation. It makes more sense to engage each such person genuinely taking the argument on the merits rather than simply labelling the source as "concern troll".

Not saying OP isn't, but just something I've been wanting to say for a while. More than once (on Reddit) people have falsely labelled me as a concern troll.

[–] TransSynthesist@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 8 months ago (1 children)

No, the downvote is that this poll is pure propaganda produced by a Catholic institution.

[–] Binthinkin@kbin.social 1 points 8 months ago

SURE they are.

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 1 points 8 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Eight months ahead of the general election, President Joe Biden remains in a precarious position as he continues to trail former President Donald Trump in a rematch among likely voters, according to the latest New York Times/Siena poll.

Amid Biden's polling troubles, two significant things stand out in the Times/Siena survey: Biden is currently losing a bloc of supporters who backed him in the 2020 election and he is virtually tied with Trump among women, a key group that backed him by 11 points that year.

In an election that could be decided by close margins in a handful of swing states, any slight defection or bump in support could prove decisive for each of the contenders.

Women, who backed Biden by a 55% to 44% margin in 2020, were key to his election, along with Democratic candidates across the country as the party held the House that year and regained control of the Senate in January 2021.

While the president has touted strong jobs growth and low unemployment, inflation during much of the COVID-19 pandemic ate into the pocketbooks of Americans and many voters remain pessimistic about the country's economic fortunes.

The poll also showed Biden ahead among suburban voters, a key group that will play a significant role in races up and down the ballot.


The original article contains 465 words, the summary contains 217 words. Saved 53%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!