this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2024
94 points (96.1% liked)

politics

19090 readers
4594 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The spending stalemate that has brought the government to the brink of a shutdown is being fueled by G.O.P. demands to add conservative spending mandates opposed by President Biden and Democrats.

The spending showdown that has brought the government to the brink of a partial shutdown this week is being fueled by Republicans in Congress, who, after failing in their efforts to slash federal funding, are still insisting on right-wing policy dictates.

House Republicans loaded up their spending bills with hundreds of partisan policy mandates, a vast majority of which had no chance of passing the Democratic-controlled Senate or being signed by President Biden.

They include measures to target various pieces of Mr. Biden’s agenda, such as one to restrict access to abortion medication and another to restrict the Department of Veterans Affairs from flagging veterans deemed mentally incompetent in a federal background check needed to buy a gun.

With just four days remaining before funding lapses for roughly a quarter of the government, some of those issues are emerging as major sticking points in negotiations to reach a deal to keep the money flowing. Republicans also are objecting to a proposed increase for federal programs aimed at providing nutrition assistance for low-income families as well as for women and infants.

all 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Hazzia@discuss.tchncs.de 18 points 8 months ago (1 children)

This sounds like an excellent opportunity for any of those "mainstream" republicans to back the democrats. If Mikey J continues to obstruct it's be hilarious if they kicked him out in favor for a dem too, but I know that thinking's a bit TOO hopeful

[–] STOMPYI@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I have a feeling this is all part of a plan to that ends in GOP not certifying presidential election results when Biden wins.

[–] stringere@sh.itjust.works 1 points 8 months ago

That is precisely why Mike Johnson was picked.

[–] GivingEuropeASpook@lemm.ee 15 points 8 months ago (1 children)

They want a shutdown lol this idea that negotiating will avert it is silly since you don't negotiate for things you don't want.

[–] Granite@kbin.social 2 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Yeah… this ain’t going to give them the effect they want. They’ll get blamed by the public and I’m here for it

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 3 points 8 months ago (4 children)

The conservative news sphere is unfortunately largely impervious to reality and rational thought.

[–] BakerBagel@midwest.social 4 points 8 months ago

The GOP always does poorly after they force a shut down in an election year though. They just dint know how to operate any differently

[–] Hominine@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

Trump desperately needs swing voters in the upcoming general and looking at the exit polls from the primaries, he is in deep shit (even within his own party at times.) This does not serve that goal in any way outside that right-wing bubble, which is a huge problem for Republicans. Here's to Biden standing his ground.

[–] LocoOhNo@lemmus.org 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

My boss is one of those "ultra Maga" lunatics. He likes to say "well, wherever you get your news isn't giving you the full story." I said "did you ever think that maybe you're being lied to by Newsmax?" He got very indignant about it. The notion that a Russian propaganda channel would lie to him of all people...

That's the thing; Dunning-Kruger is rampant among these people. And, it hasn't escaped me that it's mostly people with a Southern accent. The fact that the American South has some of the lowest education scores and highest rates of religion kind of tells you everything you need to know about who the civilized world is up against.

There's a reason Hitler had a hard-on for the Jim Crow South. The line between Confederate sympathizer and Nazi is razor thin.

The Venn diagram of confed simps and neo-Nazis is a circle, tbh.

[–] Granite@kbin.social 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

True, but conservatives are not the majority of Americans

Unfortunately, the electoral college exists, which means that isn’t as important as it should be.

[–] GivingEuropeASpook@lemm.ee 1 points 8 months ago

All they care about is their base

[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 10 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Anyone keeping track of how many of these shutdowns are caused by idiot republicans being idiots? I'm sure we're up to at least a half dozen by now...

[–] mmcintyre@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

All of them are caused by idiot Republicans being idiots would be my guess!

But google says 21 of them in the last 5 decades, or 14 since 1980, or 4 since 2010.. depending on the article and how far you want to go back.

[–] LocoOhNo@lemmus.org 7 points 8 months ago

I'll tell you how to fix this; make a law where if there is a shutdown, an immediate freeze goes into effect on the assets of every member of Congress. No access to their bank accounts, no flights, no income until the shutdown ends.

[–] heavy@sh.itjust.works 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

These dorks can't get anything done.

[–] twistypencil@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago

By dorks, you mean gop

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

This is the best summary I could come up with:


The spending showdown that has brought the government to the brink of a partial shutdown this week is being fueled by Republicans in Congress, who, after failing in their efforts to slash federal funding, are still insisting on right-wing policy dictates.

Complicating the picture for Speaker Mike Johnson, who met at the White House on Tuesday with President Biden and the other top congressional leaders, Republicans themselves have been divided over what to push for in spending talks.

Ultraconservative lawmakers who rarely support spending legislation have been the loudest voices in favor of cuts and hard-line policy provisions, but more mainstream and politically endangered Republicans have refused to back them.

In one case last fall, the more moderate lawmakers helped to sink a spending bill that prevented money from being spent to enforce a District of Columbia law that protects employees from being discriminated against for seeking contraception or abortion services.

Hard-right Republicans have tried to use their party’s razor-thin majority in the House as leverage to wring spending cuts and conservative policy conditions on how federal money can be spent from Mr. Biden and Democrats in the Senate.

Right-wing Republicans have grown increasingly unhappy as they have watched government funding keep flowing without cuts or policy changes, and they are ratcheting up pressure on Mr. Johnson to secure some kind of conservative victory in the current spending negotiations.


The original article contains 729 words, the summary contains 229 words. Saved 69%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] stringere@sh.itjust.works 1 points 8 months ago

Right-wing Republicans have grown increasingly unhappy as they have watched government funding keep flowing without cuts or policy changes

Only because the government is spending money on citizens and social programs. They don't mind the enormous military budget or all the oil, coal, gas, and farm subsidies.