this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2024
86 points (97.8% liked)

politics

18850 readers
4914 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] NoStressyJessie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Smol gobermint… parnets roigts

[–] admiralteal@kbin.social 4 points 6 months ago

Parents rights so long as it is not a parent's right to have their child recognized by their child's chosen pronouns, a parent's right to have the child fed a free school lunch, or a parent's right to have their child taught state-of-the-art science and not religious/political nonsense. We don't want those kinds of parents' rights.

[–] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 12 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] CaptainSpaceman@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago

Party of small government at work!

[–] spider@lemmy.nz 4 points 6 months ago

despite constitutional concerns

In Florida, this actually emboldens them.

[–] hperrin@lemmy.world -5 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Florida doing something good is just fucking wild right now.

[–] chakan2@lemmy.world 21 points 6 months ago (1 children)

This is so the kids stop reading about how fucked up DeSantis (and politicians in general) is, it's not about their safety. That's why it passed.

[–] Laurentide@pawb.social 3 points 6 months ago

It's also another brick in Florida's road to queer genocide. If a gay or trans child has bigoted parents, social media is often the only way they can learn about the existence of other people like them.

[–] CaptainSpaceman@lemmy.world 12 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Ah yes, censoring the youth is always the best way forward

[–] hperrin@lemmy.world -4 points 6 months ago (2 children)

It’s been well documented how bad for kids social media is. Also, not having access to social media is not the same as being censored.

[–] CaptainSpaceman@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago

Its been well documented how bad it is for all people who use it, not just minors.

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

Ice cream and hamburgers are wildly known to be unhealthy too.

[–] admiralteal@kbin.social 8 points 6 months ago

I'll believe it when I see a Florida loot box ban.

Absent clear signals they ACTUALLY care about stopping predatory business behavior directed at minors (you know, like directly targeting kids with advertisements) and protecting anyone's privacy (much less that of youths), I'll assume this is part of an agenda at building Good Christian Soldiers.