this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2024
126 points (96.3% liked)

Technology

59135 readers
6622 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 43 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Tech companies intend to be in complete control of what you see and dont see.

[–] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 10 points 8 months ago

They're in competition with the media.

[–] protist@mander.xyz 35 points 8 months ago (2 children)
[–] ElderberryLow@programming.dev 35 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I wondered the same. It’s not my primary way for getting news but it’s a good option to have if looking for articles on a certain topic.

[–] Rob@lemdro.id 13 points 8 months ago (2 children)

probally has to do with a future plan to not pay for news content.

In order for Google to improve profitability they targeted adblockers and adblockers in 3rd party browsers.

If my prediction isn't too far off, countries that enforce laws forcing Google to pay to the news may not get news at all or *very limited.

[–] ElderberryLow@programming.dev 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Them and Facebook always pitch a fit when a government tries to make them stop doing that lol

[–] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works -1 points 8 months ago

Because the content they show is literally the content the sites explicitly set up for the sole purpose of "if you link to my site, pretty please show this preview to make our link more attractive". The idea that they owe a royalty for showing the content sites are explicitly asking them to show is completely indefensible.

[–] moistclump@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Canada put a law in place last year requiring meta and Google to pay for users clicks into Canadian media. Facebook stopped allowing the sharing of our reputable news sources and I was temporarily impressed that Google continued on.

[–] Rob@lemdro.id 3 points 8 months ago

That is probally why. As more and more countries stack up more news tax for the tech companies. People seem to forget that news is optional for them, and shouldn't take that for granted.

Google search doesn't need news, Facebook doesn't need it, why would they want to pay for it?

[–] Plopp@lemmy.world 10 points 8 months ago

"We want you to interact with our new chat bot and ask it about the news" probably.

[–] SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world 21 points 8 months ago (1 children)

One more for Google Graveyard™. It doesn't surprise me. You're better off not relying on their products too much as they all disappear. Would Gmail, YouTube or Maps disappear too soon?

[–] Venator@lemmy.nz 7 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

The only reason I use Google sometimes now is for the news tab, because duck duck go doesn't have the ability to filter for older articles in its news tab.

[–] adam_y@lemmy.world 20 points 8 months ago (2 children)

It could just be me, but the quality of Google news absolutely tanked a couple of years ago.

Trying to manage news sources became increasingly difficult as clickbait infested results and suggestions.

It felt like they had lost their ability to separate "new content" from "news".

[–] bramblepatchmystery@slrpnk.net 2 points 8 months ago

I have honestly always found their news search results useless.

[–] Rob@lemdro.id 0 points 8 months ago

Try adding redditcat the end of your searches, I heard that improves search quality on Google.

[–] FBJimmy@lemmus.org 17 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I've found all of the tabs on Google have a tendency to go AWOL these days - like the other day I was searching for camera lenses and Google took away the 'Products' (formerly kmown as 'Shopping') tab, even though what I was searching for couldn't have been more obviously a product. Instead, all I could get were super low quality copy-paste blogs vaguely related to the product.

[–] clearleaf@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago

They change the interface pretty much every day. The people managing the image search are especially on crack. Features are disabled and then come back and then they're disabled and then they come back... I just go to Bing now. I'm sorry my desire to search square images was such a monkey wrench in your business model google.

[–] Plopp@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Yeah they keep removing useful options. Yay enshittification.

[–] DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 8 months ago

It's definitely on purpose to trick your muscle memory and the hope is that you purposely get driven somewhere else that you didn't consider and like using it once you get mislead there

[–] Rob@lemdro.id 2 points 8 months ago

I don't think this is new I experienced this happening last year seemingly on certian searches.

[–] LibreFish@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

There's already a number of countries trying implement news site link taxes, I wouldn't be surprised if they just gave up and decided to cut that out.

[–] tedu@azorius.net 2 points 8 months ago

Are they testing removing the news tab or are they testing different tab orders and a bug hid the news tab?

[–] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

Eventually only the bullshit tab will remain.