CEOs often "work" multiple jobs.
People trying to get their startups off the ground often work multiple jobs.
Minimum wage workers often work multiple jobs.
Why is it a problem when developers work multiple jobs?
A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.
If you're posting anything related to:
If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News
This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:
Congratulations to @Tau@aussie.zone who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition
Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:
https://aussie.zone/communities
Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.
Additionally, we have our instance admins: @lodion@aussie.zone and @Nath@aussie.zone
CEOs often "work" multiple jobs.
People trying to get their startups off the ground often work multiple jobs.
Minimum wage workers often work multiple jobs.
Why is it a problem when developers work multiple jobs?
The difference is a person who considers themselves as over employed are getting 2 wages for working the same hour.
In your examples the time is divided between orgs. If the ceo is at org 1 they do the work of org 1. Not the work of org 1 and 2.
A person having multiple minimum paying jobs only works for one org in a given shift.
I have no issue with the over employed movement, orgs don't know how people work and it's not like they are defrauding anyone. Tax is still paid, work is still being produced. They may be breaking a non compete clause but those should be illegal.
I get paid for results, not hours. My time isn't tracked. I'm a software engineer.