this post was submitted on 19 Feb 2024
58 points (79.0% liked)

New Communities

16851 readers
68 users here now

A place to post new communities all over Lemmy for discovery and promotion.

Rules

The rules may be more established as time goes on, but it's important to have a foundation to work on.

1. Follow the rules of Lemmy.world - These rules are the same as Mastodon.world's rules, which can be found here.

2. Include a community title and description in your post title. - A following example of this would be New Communities - A place to post new communities all over Lemmy for discovery and promotion.

3. Follow the formatting. - The formatting as included below is important for people getting universal links across Lemmy as easily as possible.

Formatting

Please include this following format in your post:

[link text](/c/community@instance.com)

This provides a link that should work across instances, but in some cases it won't

You should also include either:

!community@instance.com

or instance.com/c/community

FAQ:

Q: Why do I get a 404?

A: At least one user in an instance needs to search for a community before it gets fetched. Searching for the community will bring it into the instance and it will fetch a few of the most recent posts without comments. If a user is subscribed to a community, then all of the future posts and interactions are now in-sync.

Q: When I try to create a post, the circle just spins forever. Why is that?

A: This is a current known issue with large communities. Sometimes it does get posted, but just continues spinning, but sometimes it doesn't get posted and continues spinning. If it doesn't actually get posted, the best thing to do is try later. However, only some people seem to be having this problem at the moment.

Image Attribution:

Fahmi, CC BY 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0, via Wikimedia Commons

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Star_Trek is a safe harbour for Star Trek fans that may have found themselves on the receiving end of the ban hammer for daring to have an opinion that differed from the power mad mods on Reddit’s Star Trek sub and/or Lemmy’s own StarTrek.website.

You’re safe to like or dislike any show, character, writer, showrunner or episode here.

So come and discuss the greatest sci-fi franchise in history free from rogue mods on power trip.

Links

!star_trek@lemmy.zip
Star_Trek

all 47 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] cosmicrookie@lemmy.world 15 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The drama and polarization of the star trek community on Lemmy is so weird!

[–] Blaze@reddthat.com 5 points 7 months ago

It's really a unique thing, fascinating

[–] xkforce@lemmy.world 14 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

I dont trust any community that specifically caters to people that were banned from another community and makes a point to have that as part of their identity. Because being banned doesn't just include those that were unfairly banned but also the ones that were rightly banned and the latter will eventually drive out the former or theyll get kicked out again and create another "we were banned" community. I especially dont trust a community like this when ten forward already exists as an alternative.

[–] MaddieTian@lemmy.zip 7 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Go have a read of the modlog on the communities on the startrek.website instance. You’ll see that almost none are justifiable bans and nearly are all for disagreeing with the mod’s opinions or calling them out for shitty behaviour.

It was the same story on Reddit too. The mods here are the same from the main Trek sub over there. There were rumours that they were Paramount employees as they had some control over the admins too. Getting new Star Trek subs taken down very quickly if they were saying too many negative things about the current shows.

If you see the type of posts and comments on my community you’ll see that they are all very civil and are able to share their true opinions without fear of a ban.

At the moment the community is being promoted as a safe harbour for victims of the mods on the other communities but that’s a necessary evil at the moment and we will develop our own identity over time.

[–] wahming@monyet.cc 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

This is like the 3rd or 4th star trek community (that I've seen) that's been announced on this exact community, though. All with pretty much the same purpose. Why not just join one of the existing ones?

[–] MaddieTian@lemmy.zip 4 points 7 months ago

It’s the only one on Lemmy.zip and I can’t say it’s free from the other mods and people are completely free to share their opinions without being the one who sets the rules.

Besides I do have ideas for it to become a unique community over time.

[–] CeruleanRuin@lemmings.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

If it's anything like its reddit equivalent, it will just be a place for people who unironically use the words "woke", "SJW", and "DEI" as perjoratives. No thanks.

[–] Pistcow@lemm.ee 13 points 7 months ago

I wasn't a fan of the prequels

[–] wahming@monyet.cc 9 points 7 months ago (2 children)
[–] Stamets@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago

TenForward was created as an alternative to Risa, although we do allow discussion posts and news and such. For less memery and more serious?

Well we're working on that ;)

[–] Klear@sh.itjust.works 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I'm assuming this one has blackjack and/or hookers.

[–] Filthmontane@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Gene Roddenberry was a Communist and I miss the Communist ideals represented in his writing.

[–] Stamets@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Gene wasn't a Communist. I have no idea why people believe this. People keep saying it's becauseTrek is insanely Communist but it's just... Not? Everything isn't owned by the state, people own land, etc.

But back to Gene. His behavior alone shows he wasn't a Communist. He wrote lyrics to the Trek theme that were never used so he'd have a writing credit and get kickbacks from the royalties. He set up a company to sell Trek merch but put it in his new wife's name so his ex wife wouldnt get a claim on it as part of divorce proceedings. Dude leaned on everyone and destroyed relationships to make sure he had most creative control over the movies and TNG.

Nothing about him was communist.

[–] Filthmontane@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Who told you Communism is when everything is owned by the state? Communism is when society becomes so technologically advanced and so abundant in resources that the state withers away and currency is no longer needed. So, you know, Star Trek. Also, his wife said he was a Communist

[–] Stamets@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Communism is when society becomes so technologically advanced and so abundant in resources that the state withers away and currency is no longer needed.

Okay, so not Star Trek then as there is explicitly a state. The Federation itself has its own mandates and laws but every individual planet is governed as well. The Federation is a Representative Republic that has an election every 4 years.

Also, his wife said he was a Communist

Actions speak louder than words and his actions blatantly demonstrate that he was not a communist.

Roddenberry, fearing that he would not make money off of Trek, wrote lyrics to the song, without any intention of using them, to get half the royalties—money that should have gone to Courage. Courage was so furious that he never returned to work on Star Trek (Deezen). Roddenberry, unapologetic, continued to see more and more profits from the franchise, becoming very wealthy over the years. The irony is that Roddenberry identified as a communist, according to his wife Majel Barrett-Roddenberry (Bennett). One would expect someone who identified as a communist, a bold label to adopt during the Cold War, to go to greater lengths to avoid such a serious income gap between himself and his employees.

Source.

Currency was even a thing during TOS, something that often gets ignored. Federation Credits. Credits which were used to entice bounty hunters to go after specific targets, to purchase highly unique items and used to pay for the training of crewmen. Kirk bitches about how much it costs to train Spock at one point. Kirk even gave Scotty 'a weeks bonus pay' for getting the phasers up and running when dealing with the Doomsday machine. Think all that ended in TOS? Well, no. Federation Credits were still used constantly in TNG. The Barzans and their wormhole. The Federation was willing to cough up over a million credits then and there plus another 100k every year after that to get rights to the wormhole. More examples on top of that that are not exactly difficult to find.

Nothing about Trek is 'communist' and it's often wildly misunderstood to be so. Very little about Gene was communist other than a claim from his wife after the man had died. And something that he never really demonstrated at any point in his life.

[–] Filthmontane@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It's okay to believe in communism and still engage in capitalism because you're living in a capitalist society. Obviously there's only so much I can gleam without having known the guy myself. But, that being said, I'm a Communist and as a Communist, I know what Communist dog whistling sounds like and I know that, at the very least, season 1 on TNG is chock full of Communist dog whistling

[–] Stamets@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

There's a difference between believing in communism and being a Communist. You cannot have your cake and eat it too.

As for Communist dog whistling in Season 1... Care to provide examples? Hard to refute something without examples.

Trek overall though isn't Communist. There are too many glaring inconcsistencies to claim the Federation as being Communist. It's a post-scarcity socialism.

[–] Filthmontane@lemmy.world -1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Post scarcity socialism sure as shit sounds like Communism to me. In fact, one of the most important things when evolving from socialism to Communism is eliminating scarcity

[–] Stamets@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Right. "That's actually the same as what I said because one of the words in what you said is partially relevant to what I said."

This conversation is pointless if you're not going to subscribe to reality.

Goodbye.

[–] Filthmontane@lemmy.world -1 points 6 months ago

You should learn what communism actually is. It'll probably help with your arguments in the future. Read a book.