this post was submitted on 17 Jun 2023
31 points (94.3% liked)

No Stupid Questions

35726 readers
2648 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I can't see any comments from beehaw users, but the new posts from beehaw subs still show up when I sort the frontpage by "All" communities.

Am I miss understanding something here?

top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TheOneCurly@lemmy.theonecurly.page 14 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Users on lemmy.world still have a "shadow" version of the beehaw communities on lemmy.world that would normally be synced but isn't anymore. Users on lemmy.world can post to that community and it can be seen by other users there but that post doesn't go back to beehaw or anyone still federated with them.

[–] yenahmik@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What I don't understand is that I've seen posts in Beehaw communities by Beehaw accounts. Surely that shouldn't be possible with defederation? Is there some delayed output that lemmy.world has access to but they can't see our input?

[–] yukichigai@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

The way Beehaw defederated is that it simply refuses any updates issued from lemmy.world and sh.itjust.works. Updates from Beehaw are still pushed out to multiple sources that lemmy.world and sh.itjust.works can read from.

[–] positiveWHAT@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

So just the interactions with the posts are blocked, not the posts themselves? I find it a bit weird, but OK.

[–] chaorace@lemmy.sdf.org 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It means that beehaw can't "hear" anything coming from lemmy.world.

When you write a comment, it gets saved to lemmy.world (or whichever home instance you're currently using). The lemmy.world instance then broadcasts your comment out to the Fediverse. Normally, this causes other instances to see your comment and save a copy locally, which is how it's possible to see your comment on other instances. Because Beehaw ignores lemmy.world, their instance ignores the broadcast containing your comment. It's never saved to Beehaw which stops the users logged in over there from ever having a chance to see it.

In addition to ignoring lemmy.world, Beehaw is also excluding lemmy.world from it's own broadcasts. So, if someone goes and creates a post on Beehaw, the lemmy.world instance will never get told about it thus stopping those logged into lemmy.world from ever knowing it existed. You simply can't interact with something that doesn't exist, even though lemmy.world technically isn't trying to stop you.

What you're seeing here is the overlap between these two effects. The lemmy.world instance knows of old posts that exist on Beehaw, because Beehaw was still talking to lemmy.world back then. Then you as a user on lemmy.world can see the post and write a comment on it, since your comment lives on lemmy.world. Finally, lemmy.world tries to tell Beehaw about your comment and gets ignored, preventing anyone on Beehaw from ever knowing it existed.

[–] AineLasagna@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Maybe I missed some drama- why did Beehaw defederate? I have an account on there although I mainly use this one now

[–] Action_Bastid@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Beehaw, to my understanding, has 4 mods who do all the management for every single community in the entire instance.

Works okay when there's only 1,000 people.

Works less okay when there's 50,000.

[–] chaorace@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The Beehaw admins saw a disproportionately high amount of rule breaking coming from lemmy.world. They posted about it and specifically said that the issue was a combination of lemmy.world's huge userbase and open-door signup policy.

[–] polygon@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago

Also Beehaw bills itself as a "safe and inclusive space" which is huge bait to a certain type of internet scumbag. It makes Beehaw a large target for trolling and abuse. Without tools to deal with this I can see the logic in just defederating until moderation can get better. They've also been in contact with the instances they've defederated from and are discussing ways to move forward because everyone realizes this isn't an ideal situation.

I can sympathize with why they felt this was their only option, but on the plus side, this situation might just spur development of real moderation tools that are desperately needed for anyone running a Lemmy instance. Some people want to hate on Beehaw for their decision but honestly we might all be benefiting from it in the long run.

[–] techtask@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

Apparently some male user(s?) from lemmy.world and sh.itjust.works went to a feminist sub/magazine/whatever on beehaw and was posting explicit pictures of their junk. I suppose the admin tools aren't there to automate preventing it, so they just defederated?

The owners/admins of any of the instances aren't mad or anything, they just disagree about how to vet users (or vet at all), so until there's better moderation tools, they just defederated.

https://beehaw.org/post/567170

[–] half@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[–] nieceandtows@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

If lemmy.world also defederates beehaw, then we won't see any content from beehaw either.

[–] Arcanus@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why did Beehaw defederate? Do we know the actual reason?

[–] TheOneCurly@lemmy.theonecurly.page 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

They described their reasoning here: https://beehaw.org/post/567170

Effectively they have a very small mod/admin team and users from 2 instances with open signups were taking up a huge portion of their time.

Edit: And an update at least regarding sh.itjust.works https://beehaw.org/post/594843

[–] Arcanus@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Thank you for the response, the posts help put it in context for me

[–] Wigglehard@exploding-heads.com 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The real question is why are people still using that instance?

[–] lynny@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Some people prefer heavy moderation. That's the beautiful thing about the fediverse, you can choose the kind of moderation you want to deal with (on your home instance at least).

[–] jackolantern@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I’m on the fence on this one. I have a user id on beehaw but am also using kbin. Do you mind sharing why beehaw is not ok?

[–] Wigglehard@exploding-heads.com -5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sjw censorship, you will br banned eventually and lose all your posts, the woke change what is acceptable to say at light speed rate

[–] aski3252@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The instance has been around for years now and it was always very clear that it wants to be a "save space" which is heavily moderated. Why is that a problem? Let them do what they want, it's their instance.

I have no problem with it, I am saying is, don’t be shocked when they ban you and lose your profile cz what is acceptable speech suddenly changes

load more comments
view more: next ›