this post was submitted on 15 Jun 2023
143 points (100.0% liked)

Beehaw Support

2797 readers
14 users here now

Support and meta community for Beehaw. Ask your questions about the community, technical issues, and other such things here.

A brief FAQ for lurkers and new users can be found here.

Our September 2024 financial update is here.

For a refresher on our philosophy, see also What is Beehaw?, The spirit of the rules, and Beehaw is a Community


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.


if you can see this, it's up  

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

hey folks, we'll be quick and to the point with this one:

we have made the decision to defederate from lemmy.world and sh.itjust.works. we recognize this is hugely inconvenient for a wide variety of reasons, but we think this is a decision we need to take immediately. the remainder of the post details our thoughts and decision-making on why this is necessary.

we have been concerned with how sustainable the explosion of new users on Lemmy is--particularly with federation in mind--basically since it began. i have already related how difficult dealing with the explosion has been just constrained to this instance for us four Admins, and increasingly we're being confronted with external vectors we have to deal with that have further stressed our capabilities (elaborated on below).

an unfortunate reality we've also found is we just don't have the tools or the time here to parse out all the good from all the bad. all we have is a nuke and some pretty rudimentary mod powers that don't scale well. we have a list of improvements we'd like to see both on the moderation side of Lemmy and federation if at all possible--but we're unanimous in the belief that we can't wait on what we want to be developed here. separately, we want to do this now, while the band-aid can be ripped off with substantially less pain.

aside from/complementary to what's mentioned above, our reason for defederating, by and large, boils down to:

  • these two instances' open registration policy, which is extremely problematic for us given how federation works and how trivial it makes trolling, harassment, and other undesirable behavior;
  • the disproportionate number of moderator actions we take against users of these two instances, and the general amount of time we have to dedicate to bad actors on those two instances;
  • our need to preserve not only a moderated community but a vibe and general feeling this is actually a safe space for our users to participate in;
  • and the reality that fulfilling our ethos is simply not possible when we not only have to account for our own users but have to account for literally tens of thousands of new, completely unvetted users, some of whom explicitly see spaces like this as desirable to troll and disrupt and others of whom simply don't care about what our instance stands for

as Gaywallet puts it, in our discussion of whether to do this:

There's a lot of soft moderating that happens, where people step in to diffuse tense situations. But it's not just that, there's a vibe that comes along with it. Most people need a lot of trust and support to open up, and it's really hard to trust and support who's around you when there are bad actors. People shut themselves off in various ways when there's more hostility around them. They'll even shut themselves off when there's fake nice behavior around. There's a lot of nuance in modding a community like this and it's not just where we take moderator actions- sometimes people need to step in to diffuse, to negotiate, to help people grow. This only works when everyone is on the same page about our ethos and right now we can't even assess that for people who aren't from our instance, so we're walking a tightrope by trying to give everyone the benefit of the doubt. That isn't sustainable forever and especially not in the face of massive growth on such a short timeframe.

Explicitly safe spaces in real life typically aren't open to having strangers walk in off the street, even if they have a bouncer to throw problematic people out. A single negative interaction might require a lot of energy to undo.

and, to reiterate: we understand that a lot of people legitimately and fairly use these instances, and this is going to be painful while it's in effect. but we hope you can understand why we're doing this. our words, when we talk about building something better here, are not idle platitudes, and we are not out to build a space that grows at any cost. we want a better space, and we think this is necessary to do that right now. if you disagree we understand that, but we hope you can if nothing else come away with the understanding it was an informed decision.

this is also not a permanent judgement (or a moral one on the part of either community's owner, i should add--we just have differing interests here and that's fine). in the future as tools develop, cultures settle, attitudes and interest change, and the wave of newcomers settles down, we'll reassess whether we feel capable of refederating with these communities.

thanks for using our site folks.

(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dark_stang@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Started on lemmy.world but came here because of the flood of toxic users over there. Seems like the right call for now.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] OverfedRaccoon@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I love Beehaw. It was the first general instance that was suggested all over the place, even the top on join-lemmy.org for a long time. I respect what you're doing, and that's why I joined. I like the local communities and cohesiveness. And I know it's just a few instances right now (pending revisits), but I'm worried that might increase. That, and DotWorld is growing quickly and has a lot of the 1:1 communities popping up to match beloved subreddits.

It hasn't made me rethink being a Beehaw member at all, because I do respect the ethos and understand, but it also means I have to make another account to feel like I can truly interact fully across the Fediverse. But between my Beehaw account, my kbin I've decided to leave within the kbin verse for the moment, making a new one will mean 3 accounts I've got to keep up with (really 4 with the NSFW-only one). It's not difficult to do, especially toggling between them in Jerboa, but it kind of defeats the bigger purpose and unification. Just a ramble to vent. Like I said, I get it. Hope everyone has a good rest of their day.

[–] bilb@lem.monster 4 points 1 year ago

This is all well and good, but in practical terms it means that if your account is not on beehaw then you should divest your involvement with beehaw communities because it is less likely to remain federated with your home instance. Which may be what the beehaw community wants, from the sound of it.

[–] TooLikeTheNope@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago

Hope it'll turn to be right decision.

As many pointed out already feeling severed away from part of the network because of an arbitrary decision of someone else surely is going to impact on the sense of agency of that the end users here might be looking for, especially considering that many are refugees from a network where indeed someone just have took a decision for all of them which they didn't like.
So in this sense I hope the admin are taking this hard decision having well pondered the outcome. Sure it will shield from some users of some other instance, but that is also going to segregate us. And more important where will it stop? What if tomorrow there is another big instance with open registration policy where some users post something toxic here on beehaw, will that whole instance be severed too from us because of few bad apples? And where does it stops?

With this I want to say that I hope that this is a temporary decision, I hope that in the short future there will be a more granular way to ban toxic users, or ban all the users from a specific toxic community for instance, but which is not just banning the entire instance where the account of a bad apple is stored.

I know banning on a per-person basis is probably unmanageable with the current mod force, but I hope that the increasing usage of Lemmy will add features to it and also will make naturally sprout all those user made 3rd party tools which made reddit what is... was until few days ago.

Good luck and good work everyone

[–] Clbull@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago

Completely understand why you're doing this. I think you want this place to be more like an alternative to Tildes that doesn't descend into rampant shitposting, and that's completely understandable.

It's a good thing I made an account on lemmy.world too, so I won't fully miss out on the fediverse at large. Only reason I did was because I originally thought my app to join Beehaw was rejected (in actuality, I just didn't get the sign-up email, couldn't be arsed to check my spam folder and didn't even try to login for a month.)

[–] snorkitty@programming.dev 4 points 1 year ago

Thank you, again, for the swift work to keep Beehaw pleasant to read daily. I understand it is a minor annoyance, but in the long run, after learning what happened by some users from the two open instances mentioned, I have utmost confidence in feeling safe listening in with well-moderated instances like Beehaw.

[–] projectazar@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago (19 children)

This is going to be a learning process I think for a lot of people. Not just on federation, but on community building as well. You all seem to be trying to build something here, and I am willing to be patient and participate while it grows. If we get down the road and it just isn't working, I have faith that there will be open discussion on how to make this community grow while maintaining its ethos and we'll be here to figure out what is best for each of us individually.

Good on you for taking decisive action at these early stages while we figure out what we want, where we want to go, and how we want to get there on this relatively new platform.

load more comments (19 replies)

I totally understand why this has been chosen. Although it doesn't effect me yet, I'm worried it will at some point. I hope this is only temporary and it's reconsidered at some point. Splitting up the fediverse just feels like another Reddit to me.

[–] shiftleft@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

[Newbie question] I have seen and subscribed to one lemmy.world community (ProgrammerHumor), I can see it in Beehaw, I haven't tried to post yet but how does this defederation works? Its only in one way so I can see these instances communities by searching explicitly for them?

PS: I tried to find the answer in the comments but could not reach any conclusion sorry...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DarkWasp@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago

Thank you for your hard work and for creating this community, I hope it can continue to thrive. Still adjusting and taking everything in but it’s enjoyable!

[–] Pizza@feddit.uk 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I have had some questions that I can't seem to get answered over on world regarding moderation of the 'false'/shell/local beehaw communities left behind.

Idk if anyone here will know, but background essentially is that while the beehaw communities are not live and posts from beehaw/federated instances are not visible, to a world user the community itself appears as normal (albeit with low engagement) and can be posted/commented in as normal with no indication the community is no longer moderated by beehaw mods.

So how does moderation work in this regard? For example is the LGBTQ+@beehaw community now completely unmoderated for world users? Who does user reports made in those communities go to now, as world never had moderators for those communities?

I'm concerned that unless world mutually defederates, there is essentially moderation-free pockets that are rife for trolls to overtake. Then because of the lack of UI indicators that the communities are not the real version can put unsuspecting world users to being exposed to harm under the beehaw banner, which will give the false impression that beehaw allow this behaviour. Can someone help explain how the moderation works in these circumstances?

load more comments (2 replies)

Understandable, but still sad.

[–] Helix@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

If anyone has an issue with defederating to reduce stress (and worse) for our volunteer mods, please watch the Documentary "The Cleaners" (2018) about how moderators in Manila for Facebook, YouTube, Twitter & Co. got PTSD (and worse) from moderating content. Or at least this video about the traumatic life of a Facebook moderator by The Verge.

[–] Halvdan@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 year ago

I completely understand and support the decision to cut the ties, even if it is unfortunate that it should be necessary. This is a nice instance and I hope it can stay that way, even for the mods. I have no idea how much work and perseverance it takes to run something like this but I know I couldn't do it. If the people running Beehaw say that it is too much to handle, then we should believe them. Without them, this would not be the nice place it is. I'm on Sopuli myself, but I like the vibe here and would hate to see it destroyed by trolls. Just my two cents. Cheers.

[–] nii236@lemmy.jtmn.dev 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (9 children)

This is a pivotal moment in the Lemmyverse, and I'm not sure if this will be better overall or not.

It might be a fundamental flaw of federated servers, or just something that should be expected and welcomed.

I guess time will tell.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›