this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2023
38 points (71.1% liked)

sh.itjust.works Main Community

7705 readers
29 users here now

Home of the sh.itjust.works instance.

Matrix

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Can we get a consensus on whether our community should de-federate with servers that host loli? I personally think we should block them, and if that ends up not being the consensus here then I'll probably sign up on another server. I hope we can all agree to set that boundary though because I like it here and it seems otherwise pretty cool.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Supermariofan67@lemmy.fmhy.ml 54 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Please do not. Although I don't personally want to see lolicon stuff, many of the servers willing to host it have communities I want to interact with. For instance, burggit.moe is where the touhou communities went and is otherwise a pretty nice instance aside from loli communities.

It is content which, while understandably offensive to some, harms nobody. All fictional porn, no matter how deviant it is, is ultimately more ethical than real porn can be.

It should be up to users to block or hide instances with content they don't wish to see, and defederation should be reserved for communities that consistently cause interference, not for communities that simply have content which one disagrees with.

[–] theory@feddit.uk 12 points 1 year ago
[–] CookieJarObserver@burggit.moe 6 points 1 year ago

Yeah its a pretty nice experience on burggit other than the one or two loli communitys (that everyone can easily block for themselves)

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] PigglyWiggly@sh.itjust.works 42 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (8 children)

This post has the same energy as parents asking legislative bodies to not allow nudity or violence in media for the entire country. What you gain in ease of use, you lose in censorship by not getting the choice to decide.

I don’t particularly care for the loli stuff but asking the admins to make that decision deprives me of choice. This instance already defederated lemmy.grad because they’re tankies and while that happens to align with my personal beliefs, it is a slippery slope.

[–] HKayn@dormi.zone 4 points 1 year ago

It should be up to instance admins to decide, since they are ultimately responsible for the things that are hosted/accessible on their server.

I for one would not want to be effectively distributing any porn or loli stuff on my server, so I'll be defederating from instances that are entirely that.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Velkas@lemmy.cock.social 28 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Why not just leave it up to users on user by user basis? Are we already trying to regulate stuff on this platform? Block stuff if you don't like it, ignore if not. I'm by no means for loli personally, but that's going to start a snowball of overstepping and pretty soon it'll be like R where everything is locked, deleted, blocked, or hidden.

If it's not illegal, ignore it.

[–] amminadabz@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The "slippery slope" argument is a logical fallacy.

[–] lich_hegemon@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Disregarding an argument because it contains a fallacy is a fallacy too.

We've seen this happen on Reddit and I've seen it happen in multiple subs. The comment might have been alarmist but given past examples it's not unfounded.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] darkwing_duck@sh.itjust.works 25 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (15 children)

No need to defederate. I just went and blocked loli and related communities that popped up. I will never see them again.

So, my vote is NAY.

[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago

Federation is still young.

It may be easy to individually block communities now but what about in a few months/years when there are potentially 10x more communities across 10x more instances?

How intimidating would it be for a new user to have to go through 100+ communities and block them all individually instead of just blocking 5-10 instances?

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] CookieJarObserver@burggit.moe 14 points 1 year ago

Just block the communitys you don't want to see.

[–] MorksEgg@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Isn't that the point of decentralization allowing users to pick and choose what they want to see? If you don't want to see Loli all you have to do is block the server from your feed. I'm not a fan of Hentaiof any of its subs. But I digress, I'm not on your server so I guess I don't really have a say. 😁

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Cracks_InTheWalls@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 year ago (5 children)

I too would like the ability to block at the instance level as a user. Haven't come across loli, but @lemmynsfw.com does show up quite a bit when looking at All.

I have no problem at all with other sh.it.heads wanting to look at/interact with nsfw stuff from that instance, but I'm personally not interested. Given this, defederation seems extreme, but blocking on a community-by-community basis is time consuming and, as others have said, necessitates seeing the content to some degree (pretty sure you can choose whether stuff is blurred or not in your feed via the settings). I'd rather key '@lemmynsfw.com' into a block list once, and go back to what I'm doing.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Whooping_Seal@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

For the sake of argument I’ll approach this from a different perspective than everyone else.

Depending on jurisdiction there might be implications in hosting an instance that is federated with instances that host loli. I’m not familiar enough with Canada’s laws and / or le Code Civil du Québec to know if it is considered CSAM, but assuming it is does federating with those communities replicate the media on this instance as well? Would this count as ‘redistributing it’?

[–] frankyboi@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Canada laws on CSAM are very strict. even written fictional text are considered csam by law definition. And yes, a known horror novel writer has been charged for csam production in a fiction book. he's been acquitted tho, fortunately. But that raise an alarm that tell us that cops can arrest you for pretty much anything . If you sculpt a loli into ficello string cheese , that enter the definition of CP in Canada.

there is a part of definition saying: "and other visual representation " which is very vague and broad .

https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/c-46/section-163.1.html

[–] PigglyWiggly@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 year ago

If you sculpt a loli into ficello string cheese , that enter the definition of CP in Canada.

First they came for the string cheese, and I did not speak up for I was lactose intolerant

[–] starrox@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I dont think defederation is the way to go here. It could be another scenario that could be solve elegantly via a tagging system.

But I agree that stuff which is in a legal grey area or outright forbidden in many countries should not show per default on All. There already is a NSFW setting that you can activate and deactivate (this btw can solve the issue to 99% for you right now if you're willing to pass on other NSFW content).

There could be an additional setting to see things that "might be illegal in your country of residence" or simply NSFL. If you then mark such communities appropriatly it could solve the issue for people that want a) no exposure and b) no legal risk due to being shown such communities. And I count myself among those that dont want anything to do with loli or the likes.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] StarNyte@burggit.moe 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I am biased in this situation, but I just think leaving it to the individual to block specific communities is better than blocking an entire instance for every user.

[–] CookieJarObserver@burggit.moe 4 points 1 year ago

Yeah blocking a whole instance because they allow something like that is definitely way over the top of a reaction.

[–] InfiniteVariables@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago (8 children)

To everyone saying just block the communities:

  1. I don't want to have to block communities. In order to know I need to block a community, I have to see content which I feel is worth blocking. That's fine for most cases but in this case that is not fine (to me personally).

  2. I don't necessarily want to associate or interact with people who are fine having a server with loli as their home server. Not to be mean about it but that's just how I feel flat out.

I think this is an instance where de-federation is the correct course of action.

[–] J_C___@lemmy.place 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I don’t want to have to block communities. In order to know I need to block a community,

so you're puttin the onus on the admins? its the same process with different steps, just block the communities you dont want to see as they pop up. No need to search them out.

EDIT: spelling

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›