this post was submitted on 04 Feb 2024
108 points (91.5% liked)

Technology

59389 readers
2841 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Rooki@lemmy.world 40 points 9 months ago (7 children)

In a nutshell if anything breaks you are screwed ;D

[–] JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz 54 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (49 children)

It's an Apple device, what did you expect?
The thing even has an external battery pack, and instead of using USB-C so you could use any power bank you already own, they designed a completely new proprietary connector. In 2024.
Who the fuck does that anymore, except Apple?

[–] FangedWyvern42@lemmy.world 12 points 9 months ago

It’s even worse. The cable appears to be a bigger version of Lightning, because of course it is.

[–] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (6 children)

I can see the argument for having a connector that can’t be pulled out: if you were crossing a busy street or walking down a stairway with one of these strapped to your head and the cable came out, you’d be instantly blind.

[–] erwan@lemmy.ml 22 points 9 months ago (8 children)

Who the fuck wears a VR headset walking in the street, let alone crossing a road?

[–] Joelk111@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

No one, yet. The idea is (very obviously, I might mention) that we will be wearing AR or VR glasses just like many wear a smartwatch or carry a phone.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Rooki@lemmy.world 12 points 9 months ago

First of all this should NOT be the use case, it is dangerous, stupid, idiotic and shows that you dont care for your life and others.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (47 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] grahamja@reddthat.com 38 points 9 months ago (3 children)

The example video of showing wearing the headset and showing the outer display:

https://valkyrie.cdn.ifixit.com/media/2024/02/03103510/Display-Stack_sm.mp4

It is off putting and reminds me of one of the Robocop 2 Prototypes.

https://www.robocoparchive.com/info/prototypes.htm

[–] TheColonel@reddthat.com 15 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I don’t know what I expected but that was mortifying.

[–] laughterlaughter@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

This is a fun, silly discussion and I love it!

But hey, what you're seeing is just some internal component, so why would that be mortifying? I found it hilarious!

[–] HerbalGamer@sh.itjust.works 11 points 9 months ago

holy fucking shit what the fuck is that

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] xenomor@lemmy.world 34 points 9 months ago (12 children)

Just think about it for a moment. Apple made a mask, that when you wear it in your face, projects a 3D animated avatar if you face on the outside. That is so weird, f’ed up and dystopian.

[–] nikt@lemmy.ca 32 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (11 children)

I won’t argue about whether this is dystopian, but the practical reason for the face projection is that they wanted to make this not just something you wear sitting alone in your basement, like most other VR headsets. They wanted it to be usable around other people, at a workplace, with family, etc.

Interacting with someone wearing a full face blind is just weird, so they thought that making the eyes visible would help make this a bit more socially usable.

I’m not sure that’s really going to work out — seems at least as awkward as Google’s failed Glass project — but Apple’s design decision has some merit.

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip 17 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (4 children)

Google Glass really feels smarter in this particular regard.

Also they decided to stuff everything into the headset.

Maybe making it a separate thing and moving as much mass and volume as possible to something worn on your belt or your back would be a better idea. EDIT: But I do understand how this doesn't fit their marketing.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Socsa@sh.itjust.works 3 points 9 months ago

It's super easy to know if someone is looking at you when they take off the headset

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] weew@lemmy.ca 22 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I think it's just straight up uncanny valley. Don't think it's especially "dystopian" per se.

Honestly cartoon eyes might have actually worked better here.

[–] Marin_Rider@aussie.zone 4 points 9 months ago

should just be some googly eyes

[–] SPRUNT@lemmy.world 20 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I'm convinced that the only reason they did the eye thing is so they can get micro transactions for people buying custom eyes like cats and aliens and shit.

[–] AlfredEinstein@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] VampyreOfNazareth@lemm.ee 14 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It's really cheesy and cringe, a product looking for a problem.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] GBU_28@lemm.ee 9 points 9 months ago

I wouldn't go so far as fucked up and dystopian. It's just an odd style choice.

[–] erwan@lemmy.ml 4 points 9 months ago

I don't know, I could see the value if it really looked like the mask was semi transparent.

So it's a cool idea, the only problem is that they didn't deliver and the result is creepy instead.

[–] abhibeckert@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

That is so weird, f’ed up and dystopian.

It's not as weird as the Meta Quest, where you literally have no idea wether the person wearing it is looking at you or not.

The view of someone's eyes is very low quality - I'll give you that. But it's better than nothing at all. And I'm not sure they could've done better without doubling the price of the product.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] HerbalGamer@sh.itjust.works 16 points 9 months ago (2 children)
[–] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 7 points 9 months ago (1 children)

🎶It's not the best choice...🎶

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›