Ohhhh. It's at a former coal site.
I couldn't work out the reason behind adding a battery to a coal power station, when the coalies claim that coal was needed for when renewables+battery wouldn't work.
A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.
If you're posting anything related to:
If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News
This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:
Congratulations to @Tau@aussie.zone who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition
Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:
https://aussie.zone/communities
Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.
Additionally, we have our instance admins: @lodion@aussie.zone and @Nath@aussie.zone
Ohhhh. It's at a former coal site.
I couldn't work out the reason behind adding a battery to a coal power station, when the coalies claim that coal was needed for when renewables+battery wouldn't work.
Engie, who own the Hazelwood site (with some partners) are on the hook to "rehabilitate" it when they are done burning coal.
And they are definitely done burning coal, because it's no longer cost effective to maintain the old equipment and it's definitely too risky to build new burners.
So here's what they plan for the site long term: https://www.hazelwoodrehabilitation.com.au/
And in the short term, they are still a power company, so why not plonk their new batteries there, the site they own and which already has big connections to the power networks.
Hopefully it helps retrain workers too. God knows we could do with a load more sparkies at any rate.