this post was submitted on 03 Feb 2024
19 points (100.0% liked)

News

23303 readers
5275 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The United States and Britain struck at least 30 Houthi targets in Yemen on Saturday in a second wave of assaults meant to further disable Iran-backed groups that have relentlessly attacked US and international interests in the wake of the Israel-Hamas war, American officials told the Associated Press.

Ships and fighter jets launched the latest strikes against the Houthis. The strikes follow an air assault in Iraq and Syria on Friday that targeted other Iran-backed militias and the Iranian Revolutionary Guard in retaliation for the drone strike that killed three US troops – William Jerome Rivers, Kennedy Ladon Sanders and Breonna Alexsondria Moffett – in Jordan last weekend.

US defense secretary Lloyd Austin said the military action “sends a clear message to the Houthis that they will continue to bear further consequences if they do not end their illegal attacks on international shipping and naval vessels”.

Archive

top 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] leraje@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Personally I'm beyond thrilled to live in a country that ignores what's happening to people in Palestine but jumps into action the very second profits are in jeopardy.

[–] phx@lemmy.ca 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

You mean, a country that has made diplomatic requests regarding the foreign nation in question, but isn't willing to jump right into a complicated foreign conflict that's being brewing in various ways for centuries, and then does react when a different foreign nation starts taking pot-shots at their own vessels? Yeah I can't imagine why that might be

[–] leraje@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 9 months ago

No I mean two nations that have been heavily involved in the situation in question from day one, keeping one of those nations afloat financially and making them the main military power in the area standing by and doing nothing whist the gvmt they've created and support steamroller a whole set of people but perfectly happy to protect their financial interests. I can imagine why that might be.

[–] Drusas@kbin.social 3 points 9 months ago (4 children)

I don't know what these rebel/terrorist groups expected to happen after directly attacking the US military, but I'm pretty sure the rest of us knew almost exactly what was going to happen.

I get it: they hate the US and want them out of the region. Attacking the US brings them to the region.

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

It's Iran's asymmetrical warfare playbook.

[–] nucleative@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

Not only this, but the US has more firepower in the region than the rebel groups by such a wide measure that launching any laughing an attack against the ships is essentially a suicide note for that particular neighborhood block.

[–] fiat_lux@kbin.social 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Attacking the US brings them to the region.

The US never left the region. Airstrikes have been conducted by the US in Yemen almost every year for nearly a decade.

The US has also bombed Syria and Iraq this year. It is the beginning of February.

[–] gnate@lemmy.world -1 points 9 months ago

"About a decade" also being the length of time that the Houthis have been attacking ships in the strait.

[–] electric_nan@lemmy.ml -2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

There is nothing they can do to keep the US out of the region. They are fucking pissed that the US is fully supporting a genocide in Palestine. They are doing what they can.

[–] Drusas@kbin.social 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Doing what they can by killing Americans in Jordan who are uninvolved in the conflict in Gaza. Justifying murder is still justifying murder regardless of how you feel about the government those people work for.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social -1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

America is sure as hell not unrelated. They're defending Israel politically, economically and militarily right as we speak.

[–] Drusas@kbin.social 3 points 9 months ago (3 children)

We're not talking about "America". We're talking about individual people who are not engaged in the conflict.

[–] gmtom@lemmy.world -1 points 9 months ago

What?? They are still American military.

Do you think everyone the US has killed in their stroked have been ck firmed to be personally involved in the red sea blockade?

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social -1 points 9 months ago

American bases in the middle east are part of how they support Israel militarily (and genocide Yemen but let's set that aside for now). While they weren't directly involved, they are viable targets.

[–] electric_nan@lemmy.ml -1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Crying about individual US soldiers in a thread justifying dozens of airstrikes on Yemen. You think those strikes (or the thousands before it) only killed those directly involved in war? Or do you think only the relatively powerless have a moral obligation to avoid noncombatant (not even nonmilitary lol) casualties?

[–] Drusas@kbin.social 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

You obviously haven't read my previous replies because I have said it is all murder.

[–] electric_nan@lemmy.ml -1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Pro world peace then? Wow, very enlightened and useful opinion. While we all hold our breath waiting for that to happen, the murders will continue, and the belligerents and victims have different degrees of power and culpability.

[–] Drusas@kbin.social 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] electric_nan@lemmy.ml -1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

As useful as your opinion.

[–] Drusas@kbin.social 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Sympathizing with human suffering and being against violence, terrible opinion.

[–] electric_nan@lemmy.ml -1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It's not bad, it's just useless in this context. Honestly, worse than useless. If you're just saying "all this killing is bad", then it seems an awful lot like 'both-sidesing'. Like no shit it's bad, but it isn't going to stop until we address the root causes. If you put for example, the Yemenis and the US on equal standing for the problems in the region, you are perpetuating the roots of this violence.

[–] Drusas@kbin.social 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Sure, but I haven't done that. You seem to be doing some projecting.

[–] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 0 points 9 months ago

Maybe so. Sorry.

[–] gmtom@lemmy.world -1 points 9 months ago

Remember that "Houthis" are just an ethnic group in Yemen. The organisation co ducting these attacks is called "ansar allah" the west purposely calls them houthis instead of Ansar Allah to justify indiacrimite attacks on civil populations.

[–] pan_troglodytes@programming.dev -1 points 9 months ago