this post was submitted on 03 Feb 2024
404 points (95.3% liked)

linuxmemes

20880 readers
690 users here now

I use Arch btw


Sister communities:

Community rules

  1. Follow the site-wide rules and code of conduct
  2. Be civil
  3. Post Linux-related content
  4. No recent reposts

Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Next evolution, just a one line bash script.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] linearchaos@lemmy.world 95 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Me: install it, doesn't work, read the docs, screw with all the missing things, doesn't work, read the forms, install something else I missed, doesn't work, find more forums, find the right answer, patch it up, get it working, figure out that the application is slow, missing critical features, and really just doesn't do what I needed to do.

[–] TeaEarlGrayHot@lemmy.ca 48 points 8 months ago (1 children)

All-in-all a weekend well spent

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] deweydecibel@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago

Or it does work, and then I never actually end up using it again.

And then months later I'll have to do something similar and I've forgotten I even installed something that can do that, so I install another related thing.

[–] punkwalrus@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

really just doesn’t do what I needed to do.

This has been my experience, or sort of does what I want it to do, but I have to rethink what I need it to do instead of something really simple. Like a "new type of shared file system" that replaces NFS/Windows sharing. So instead of files in a standard file system one can manage with a file browser, it has "indexed" your files in such a way that the actual files are renamed into data chunks, and one "finds" files by their non-intuitive search engine that can't do even basic search engine tricks like "AND/OR" searches, wildcards, and the results are hit and miss. "But it's faster and more elegant!" So how do you restore from backup when the system fails? "When the system does whatnow?"

Yeah, no thanks. I can recover files from a file system much easier than some proprietary encoded bullshit fronted with a bad search engine over a proprietary and buggy index.

[–] linearchaos@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

I asked the other week if anyone made a system that left files alone and just indexed them and gave you a place to store meta without moving them. Options do seem to exist, but they need LOTS of extra work

[–] Dasnap@lemmy.world 32 points 8 months ago (1 children)

When the project installation steps start with a 'git clone'.

[–] TheInsane42@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

Nah, to much work, use curl to download a script and blindly run it...

[–] Evilschnuff@feddit.de 25 points 8 months ago

I believe this to be true for nearly all products. It has to be super simple to test, because you need to assess if it fits your needs. The mental model for a priori assessment is not strong enough usually.

[–] jukibom@lemmy.world 22 points 8 months ago (4 children)

I'm the opposite because I've had nothing but bad luck with docker. I should really spend more time with it but ugh

[–] CosmicTurtle@lemmy.world 10 points 8 months ago

It's definitely worth learning. I had the damnedest time with docker until I went to a meetup and had someone ELI5 to me. And it wasn't that I wasn't technical. I just couldn't wrap my head around so many layers of extraction.

The guy was very patient with me and helped me get started with docker compose and the rest is history.

[–] rowdyrockets@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago (4 children)

Try running portainer. Gives you a nice management GUI. Docker didn’t unlock for me until I started using portainer.

[–] Dasnap@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

I was the same with Kubernetes until I started using Lens to monitor the clusters.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 8 months ago

What's wrong with it

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Crow@lemmy.world 19 points 8 months ago (1 children)

It’s because I’ve seen What people can do with a simple docker container that I completely agree. It’s too nice to go back.

[–] fireflash38@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I'd agree more if most docker stuff didn't depend on running as root.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 9 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I think your looking for podman

[–] platypus_plumba@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

yeha, but the big projects like linuxserver.io love creating docker images with root access, even if people have warned them it is an awful security practice. I rewrote all of their images in a personal repo, screw that. I won't run shit as root in my machine, even in containers.

[–] Tja@programming.dev 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Ah to be young and have that kind of energy... Enjoy it!

[–] HappyRedditRefugee@lemm.ee 1 points 8 months ago

Im young and have neither of those tho :(

[–] brophy@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

There's rootless docker, or podman, or numerous other container runtimes. The beauty in containers is separating concerns. How you choose to run it, root or rootless, is up to you in all but the nichest of scenarios.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Tja@programming.dev 15 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I was blown away how a relatively unknown project like immich provides one Docker compose file to bring up a whole self-hosted ~~Google photos~~ photo management suite, complete with tagging, mapping, transcoding and semantic search. Local, offline semantic search.

[–] Harvey656@lemmy.world 12 points 8 months ago (1 children)

This oh my God. Just the other day I tried to install a project off git, it had a nice little .bat file to install all the requirements except half if them just didn't exist or were so niche I couldn't find anything on them after searching. Would love more dockers please.

[–] Railcar8095@lemm.ee 10 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

.bat?

*starts loading shotgun.

Surely you mean .sh, right?

[–] Samsy@lemmy.ml 4 points 8 months ago

Ah well, maybe he used to much aliases? starts sweating in penguin costume

[–] Harvey656@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

Naw they only had windows projects. I run all my stuff through VMware. Gotta have windows for stupid easy anti-cheat. Trust me I only use it when I have to, please put the gun down mr railcar!

[–] rushaction@programming.dev 12 points 8 months ago (2 children)

For me it's more like new interesting self hosted project and then find out it's only distributed as a docker container without any proper packaging. As someone who runs FreeBSD, this is a frustration I've run into with quite a number of projects.

[–] zaphod@lemmy.ca 7 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (8 children)

Eh even as a Linux admin, I prefer hand installs I understand over mysterious docker black boxes that ship god knows what.

Sure, if I'm trialing something to see if it's worth my time, I'll spin up a container. But once it's time to actually deploy it, I do it by hand.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] aodhsishaj@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] rushaction@programming.dev 4 points 8 months ago

Virtualization in general? Sure, I can. I've tried it a bit with bhyve. But it's definitely a lot heavier since I'm now running a full Linux os and dedicating resources to it to run docker just to run a python or node app.

Learning the project is in Go though is a sigh of relief. Professionally I've moved to Go (from Python) just because it's so damn easy to build and distribute.

I just wish there was better support for the other *nix's. While the language support them just fine, docker on the other hand strangles it. =(

[–] brenno@lemmy.brennoflavio.com.br 4 points 8 months ago

As someone that uses FreeBSD as its main server, it's kinda the other way around haha

[–] KuroeNekoDemon@sh.itjust.works 3 points 8 months ago

Yeah nah no thanks I'm not wasting my time with that

[–] mlg@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

Yeah no thanks I actually enjoy customizing my installs and not relying on docker for config management which it really shouldn't be used for.

Only container I have that was well worth it is the OSX vm which makes it easy to swap versions and options without having to coax the crappy apple software.

Which I also only have because I thought it'd be funny to demo bluebubbles to my friends.

[–] TeaEarlGrayHot@lemmy.ca 2 points 8 months ago

I was so surprised by how easy it was to install Yacy--I'd thought a self-hosted search engine would be tough, but I made a docker-compose file and pointed my reverse proxy to the server, works perfectly so far!

[–] Sibbo@sopuli.xyz 1 points 8 months ago

As a NixOS user, I pick whatever is supported well as a NixOS package.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 8 months ago

Building a docker container isn't normally to hard. I usually will create a PR with a dockerfile and docker compose

load more comments
view more: next ›