this post was submitted on 14 Jan 2022
1 points (100.0% liked)

cryptocurrency

2819 readers
10 users here now

The largest cryptocurrency community on the Fediverse!

Lemmy community dedicated to cryptocurrency news, technicals, education, memes and so more!

💬 Chat on Community Improvements and Development

Community Knowledge Base:

Be nice, have fun.

Community rules:

General lemmy.ml instance rules applicable here too.

Ugly brother of this community: bωockchain

For a community devoted to cryptography itself, visit c/cryptography

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] cypherpunks@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 years ago

As I noted in a comment here the story about bitcoin's hashrate decreasing by 14% (or even measurably at all) due to events in Kazakhstan was totally fake and is trivially debunkable by just looking at a graph of the hashrate.

The Guardian 🤌

[–] PointyFluff@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 years ago (2 children)
[–] ashenone@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 years ago

I do the same with XMR miners in the winter. If I gotta use electric heat might as well make it useful!

[–] tracyspcy@lemmy.ml -1 points 3 years ago (2 children)

is there any economic sense in it?

[–] PointyFluff@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 years ago

A space heater consumes 1500 w. My miner consumes 1300 w. A space heater doesn't have any return on the power cost except heat. My miner brings about $5Usd in profit per week after power.

[–] leanleft@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 years ago (1 children)

i think you would need a good ASIC miner to make it plausible.
generally, many people think POW coins are bad for the environment.

[–] Slatlun@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 years ago

If you use the energy input to do work and consider the heat generation as waste, I see the carbon impact of mining.

If you just use the cpu as a substitute for the resistance coil in a space heater with the intention of making heat, is there waste?

My understanding (and I could be absolutely wrong) is that nearly all of the energy used by a computer is converted to heat eventually. If that's true the only difference is that some work gets done in the middle. Is that right?