this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2023
51 points (100.0% liked)

Gaming

30526 readers
221 users here now

From video gaming to card games and stuff in between, if it's gaming you can probably discuss it here!

Please Note: Gaming memes are permitted to be posted on Meme Mondays, but will otherwise be removed in an effort to allow other discussions to take place.

See also Gaming's sister community Tabletop Gaming.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

At this point it seems that Blizzard can't decide what it wants to do with Overwatch. It seems kind of baffling how they've handled what is basically a live service cash cow.

top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] LadyAutumn@lemmy.blahaj.zone 22 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I still don't understand why the community has been so tolerant of blizz forcing a sequel so they can directly charge money for skins.

[–] Amby@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 year ago

OW2 came with some genuinely good gameplay changes (depending on who you ask. The topic of 5v5 is contentious at best.) that made the game feel legitimately fresh. Could it have been a "2.0" patch/expansion instead of being presented as a sequel? Probably. But skins are optional as always because the real meat of the game was the gameplay since the start.

[–] Cian@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 year ago

Feels worth noting that the Pve was always planned on being a paid module for Ow2, but now it looks like they're making us pay per mission which is just absurdly greedy, Holy fuck.

[–] Heisl@feddit.de 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This game is dead. Very sad because OW1 prime was one of the best gaming experiences I had

[–] EnigmaNL@feddit.nl 4 points 1 year ago

I'd love to get OW1 back. It was better in every single way.

[–] Cian@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Feels worth noting that the PvE was always planned on being a paid module, but now they're making us pay per mission instead of just buying a full campaign which is absolutely ridiculous.

[–] sarsaparilyptus@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago

Before long you'll pay per kill, and then per shot. "It costs $400,000 to fire this gun for 12 seconds" will come true in the wrong game.

[–] briongloid@aussie.zone 6 points 1 year ago

This was a fantastic game several years ago, it's a shame what they did to it.

[–] Kuvwert@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

Biggest rug-pull in gaming history

[–] Yabai@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago

lmao, eat my ass blizzard

[–] simple@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Every day news of this game comes out I thank God that I stopped playing when OW2 came out.

[–] BurningnnTree@lemmy.one 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The idea of charging for PvE missions sounds bad on the surface (especially given the attitude surrounding Overwatch 2 at the moment) but honestly I think this sounds totally fine. I mean it's basically like a paid expansion, which is a rare thing nowadays in the age of live service games. Personally I like the idea of paying a finite amount of money for a finite amount of content. The only question is whether these three missions are actually fun and replayable enough to be worth $15.

[–] BitR1ot@fedia.io 1 points 1 year ago

Sure, charging a reasonable price for additional content is fine. This has been happening for decades as expansions.

This feels particularly odd because Overwatch previously had events (Summer, Halloween, etc) where they released PvE content for free and the community loved it. I played a fair bit of Junkenstein and Lucio ball, it was exciting when it happened for a limited time.

I hope the missions have enough content to warrant the $15 USD price. OW2 disappointed me and it feels like every news article continues that trend.

[–] Tgnome@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The only reason I would go back and play overwatch 1 every once in a while was for the free pve events. I'd then get sucked into pvp again for a bit, spend some money without thinking, and then leave again. If they start charging for pve events I won't be tempted back into that loop.

[–] banjoman05@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago

“The blog post does note that you'll have permanent access to the Overwatch 2: Invasion story missions…”

Yeah, after I bought Overwatch and can’t access it at all I have little trust for dropping more money on anything Overwatch 2.

[–] Nymphioxetine@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

So wait did they or did they not cancel the PvE, because the Xbox showcase made it seem like there was more PvE but it smelled of desperation.

[–] LilBagOfBunnies@beehaw.org 5 points 1 year ago

I think Blizz is still doing PvE in a similar vein as OW1's PvE events but utilizing some of what they worked on, but there won't be a full-fledged story mode for PvE anymore.

[–] Amby@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 year ago

PvE wasn't canceled, what was cancelled was unique talent trees for each hero and whatever "hero missions" was. What we're getting is (what appears to be) episodic story content with scripted events and cinematics.

[–] BurningnnTree@lemmy.one 1 points 1 year ago

It's really not clear what exactly they canceled, since they never announced much to begin with. I think they just scrapped the talent trees?

[–] Amby@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The blog post doesn't actually make it that clear if they're charging to play the PvE (optimistic I know).

Permanent access to the Overwatch 2: Invasion Story Missions

But given it's Overwatch, the bad press has already started and will no doubt spread like wildfire. They only have themselves to blame so w/e.

[–] Zack99@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

Oh fuck off blizzard

load more comments
view more: next ›