this post was submitted on 31 Jan 2024
114 points (96.0% liked)

politics

19097 readers
3273 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

In short, the federal judiciary has failed the country in allowing a renegade ex-president to nullify federal law by means of a more or less open policy of endless delay by means of frivolous motions, appeals and more. As the old adage has it, justice delayed is justice denied. This hasn’t simply been during his criminal prosecutions, which I will discuss in a moment. It stretched over the time of his presidency as well. We know that during his presidency President Trump filled the federal judiciary with a slew of right-wing judges, many of them out-and-out corrupt. He also corrupted the Supreme Court with his unprecedented three appointments in a single term. But here I’m not even talking about right-wing Republican judges who often appear partial to Donald Trump’s ideological aims and frequently his narrower electoral ones as well. We know for instance that Judge Aileen Cannon, a corrupt and transparently partisan Trump appointee, has more or less single-handedly sabotaged the classified documents prosecution. Set that all aside. What I’m talking about are the fair-minded judges who allow a mix of institutional courtesy, established practice and inertia to allow Trump to make a mockery of the criminal justice system

top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] negativenull@lemmy.world 17 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Class action lawsuit against the judiciary for delaying justice that effects every person in the country?

j/k (or am I?)

[–] blazera@kbin.social 15 points 9 months ago

forget the judiciary, the DoJ didnt even charge Trump for the insurrection until late last year. It's been in the hands of the courts way less time than in the hands of DoJ.

[–] SatanicNotMessianic@lemmy.ml 10 points 9 months ago (1 children)

That (iirc) Harvard professor specialized in fascism wrote that we cannot count on institutions for protection. We’ve seen that institutions, including the judiciary, can be taken over and corrupted. Trump has stated multiple times that one of his first acts as president will be to basically clear the decks of the federal government and fire all of the non-Trumpist personnel. His lawyer even argued that the president can break any law, up to and including murder, and impeachment is the only process to hold them accountable. I’m not even sure how that’s supposed to work, since then they could arrest or kill everyone in Congress who would support their impeachment.

Basically, we’re fucked.

I mean… do they want political assassinations? Because that’s how you get political assassinations.

[–] A_A@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago (1 children)

if USA decides Trump is a criminal before November 2024, let him decay in jail.

Otherwise, Biden, with absolute immunity, should kill Trump for democracy's sake.

After this, Biden has to declare to be culprit of murder and argue he has to be accountable for this crime so USA doesn't fall into fascism. This would end the madness of presidential absolute immunity.

[–] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 9 months ago

Biden would go down as one of the most important presidents that way. But probably he’s just going to remain Not Trump, which is the next best realistic thing I guess.

[–] NegativeLookBehind@kbin.social 8 points 9 months ago

I feel very strongly that the judicial system will fail the American people in convicting this treasonous shitbag.

[–] Vaggumon@lemm.ee 2 points 9 months ago

I've said from the very beginning, he will never face justice.

[–] watson387@sopuli.xyz 2 points 9 months ago

All according to their plan. Trump appoints corrupt Christofascist judges. Corrupt Christofascist judges try to delay all rulings until AFTER a Trump re-election, when he'll pardon himself of all crimes. Empowered by said judges and their absolutely bonkers at times interpretations of law, Trump can then inflict the Christofascist regime (Project 2025) on the United States populace. This is a hostile right-wing takeover of the United States government.

[–] watson387@sopuli.xyz 1 points 9 months ago

All according to their plan. Trump appoints corrupt Christofascist judges. Corrupt Christofascist judges try to delay all rulings until AFTER a Trump re-election, when he'll pardon himself of all crimes. Empowered by said judges and their absolutely bonkers at times interpretations of law, Trump can then inflict the Christofascist regime (Project 2025) on the United States populace. This is a hostile right-wing takeover of the United States government.