this post was submitted on 28 Jan 2024
133 points (96.5% liked)

Technology

58287 readers
7502 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

> NSA officials told Wyden that not only is the intelligence agency purchasing data on Americans located in the US but that it also bought Americans' Internet metadata.

Source: https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2024/01/nsa-finally-admits-to-spying-on-americans-by-purchasing-sensitive-data/

Why do you need to spy, when you can simply... buy?

We gave up our data willingly and made it easy for all the 3-letter agencies of the world. We only have ourselves to blame. 🤷‍♂️

(Link HT: @technology)

top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Ep1cFac3pa1m@lemmy.world 37 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Yeah the scandal here isn’t that the NSA bought it, it’s that it’s available for purchase in the first place.

[–] OpticalMoose@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Seriously. Why act like the NSA are the bad guys? It's literally their job. They would be negligent in their duties if they didn't do it.

If people want more privacy, they need to change the fucking laws.

[–] Ep1cFac3pa1m@lemmy.world 11 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Oh I’m no fan of the NSA purchasing untold amounts of data about Americans, but seriously how can you blame them for it when the data is readily and legally available for purchase by pretty much anyone? These datasets shouldn’t exist in the first place.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Yeah, "we can do it because there aren't laws against it" is pretty much the worst justification for anything unethical.

But I guess what do you expect when a large amount of the world equates "legal" with "moral and ethical."

[–] OpticalMoose@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 8 months ago

I'm with ya on that. I could rant on and on about privacy, but this ain't the place for that, I guess. The gov't promised if we let ISPs and telcos turn over our data they could catch all the terrorists, and now 20 years later they can't even catch kids making prank phone calls (SWATting) or telemarketers.

I guess it's true, people get the leadership they deserve.

[–] cmat273@sh.itjust.works 10 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Bro what? No. Why can't we be mad at both the NSA and the fact that it's available to purchase?

[–] OpticalMoose@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Be mad at them all you want. But being mad at them doesn't change anything.

Edit: Sorry. I didn't mean for that to come out snippy. My point is there's nothing wrong with being mad. It's the action that gets results.

[–] BobGnarley@lemm.ee 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

No, their job is to spy on NON DOMESTIC citizens. A court ruled that what they did under Snowden was illegal as fuck and they pinky swore not to do it anymore. Them spying on American citizens that don't communicate with foreigners is supposed to be illegal. You said it so confidently, but you are mistaken.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/NSA_warrantless_surveillance_(2001%E2%80%932007)